View this in:
English Devanagari Telugu Tamil Kannada Malayalam Gujarati Odia Bengali  |
Marathi Assamese Punjabi Hindi Samskritam Konkani Nepali Sinhala Grantha  |
This document is in Gurmukhi script, commonly used for Punjabi language.

ਸ਼੍ਰੀਮਦ੍ਭਗਵਦ੍ਗੀਤਾ ਪਾਰਾਯਣ - ਤ੍ਰਯੋਦਸ਼ੋ਽ਧ੍ਯਾਯਃ

The thirteenth chapter of the Bhagavad Gita, titled ਕ੍ਸ਼ੇਤ੍ਰਕ੍ਸ਼ੇਤ੍ਰਜ੍ਞਵਿਭਾਗਯੋਗਃ (Kshetra-Kshetrajna Vibhaga ਯੋਗ), opens with the echo of war drums on the fields of ਕੁਰੁਕ੍ਸ਼ੇਤ੍ਰ. Here, in the heart of the ਮਹਾਭ੍ਹਾਰਤ epic, ਸ਼੍ਰੀਕ੍ਰੁਰੁਇਸ਼੍ਣ and ਅਰ੍ਜੁਨ continue their profound dialogue, surrounded by the armies of the ਪਾਂਡਵਾਃ and ਕੌਰਵਾਃ. The battlefield is more than a place of conflict; it is a stage for timeless questions about life, identity, and purpose. Amid the tension and uncertainty, ਸ਼੍ਰੀਕ੍ਰੁਰੁਇਸ਼੍ਣ invites ਅਰ੍ਜੁਨ to look beyond the immediate chaos and explore the deeper layers of existence.

In the previous chapters, especially the twelfth, the Gita explored the path of devotion-ਭਕ੍ਤਿ-ਯੋਗ-emphasizing love, surrender, and the relationship between the devotee and the divine. ਸ਼੍ਰੀਕ੍ਰੁਰੁਇਸ਼੍ਣ revealed how unwavering devotion can lead to liberation, and how the heart's longing for the eternal can transform even the most ordinary life. Now, the conversation shifts gears. The focus turns inward, toward the nature of the self and the body, the field and the knower of the field.

This chapter's central theme is the distinction between the physical body (ਕ੍ਸ਼ੇਤ੍ਰ) and the conscious self (ਕ੍ਸ਼ੇਤ੍ਰਜ੍ਞ). ਸ਼੍ਰੀਕ੍ਰੁਰੁਇਸ਼੍ਣ explains that the body, with all its sensations, memories, and desires, is like a field-ever-changing, subject to birth and decay. The true self, the ਆਤ੍ਮਾ, is the knower of this field: silent, aware, untouched by time. Through vivid metaphors and clear reasoning, ਸ਼੍ਰੀਕ੍ਰੁਰੁਇਸ਼੍ਣ urges ਅਰ੍ਜੁਨ to recognize this difference, much like a person realizing they are not the clothes they wear or the roles they play.

The chapter also explores what it means to truly know oneself. It discusses qualities like humility, patience, and honesty, which prepare the mind for self-knowledge. ਸ਼੍ਰੀਕ੍ਰੁਰੁਇਸ਼੍ਣ describes the ultimate wisdom as seeing the same divine presence in all beings, regardless of their outward differences. This vision dissolves the boundaries that separate us, inviting a sense of unity and compassion that transcends the battlefield.

Looking ahead, the next chapter will dive deeper into the three fundamental qualities-ਗੁਣs-that shape human nature and behavior. But before that, ਸ਼੍ਰੀਕ੍ਰੁਰੁਇਸ਼੍ਣ lays the groundwork here, helping ਅਰ੍ਜੁਨ (and all of us) understand the difference between what we experience and the one who experiences. It is a call to wake up to our own awareness, to see ourselves not just as actors in the world, but as the silent witness behind it all.

ਓਂ ਸ਼੍ਰੀ ਪਰਮਾਤ੍ਮਨੇ ਨਮਃ
ਅਥ ਤ੍ਰਯੋਦਸ਼ੋ਽ਧ੍ਯਾਯਃ
ਕ੍ਸ਼ੇਤ੍ਰਕ੍ਸ਼ੇਤ੍ਰਜ੍ਞਵਿਭਾਗਯੋਗਃ

Meaning (ਪਦਾਰ੍ਥ):
ਓਂ - sacred syllable
ਸ਼੍ਰੀ - auspicious, revered
ਪਰਮਾਤ੍ਮਨੇ - to the Supreme Self
ਨਮਃ - salutations
ਅਥ - now, thus
ਤ੍ਰਯੋਦਸ਼ਃ - thirteenth
ਅਧ੍ਯਾਯਃ - chapter
ਕ੍ਸ਼ੇਤ੍ਰ - field (body, realm of experience)
ਕ੍ਸ਼ੇਤ੍ਰਜ੍ਞ - knower of the field (conscious principle)
ਵਿਭਾਗ - distinction, division
ਯੋਗਃ - union, discipline

Translation (ਭਾਵਾਰ੍ਥ):
Om. Salutations to the Supreme Self. Now begins the thirteenth chapter, called 'The Yoga of the Distinction between the Field and the Knower of the Field.'

Commentary (ਅਨੁਸਂਧਾਨ):
This introductory verse sets the stage for the thirteenth chapter of the Bhagavad Gita, highlighting the key concepts of ਕ੍ਸ਼ੇਤ੍ਰ (the field), ਕ੍ਸ਼ੇਤ੍ਰਜ੍ਞ (the knower of the field), and their ਵਿਭਾਗ (distinction). The term ਕ੍ਸ਼ੇਤ੍ਰ refers to the body or the domain of experience, while ਕ੍ਸ਼ੇਤ੍ਰਜ੍ਞ points to the conscious self that observes and interacts with this field. The word ਯੋਗਃ here suggests a method or discipline for understanding the relationship and difference between these two. The invocation with ਓਂ and ਸ਼੍ਰੀ ਪਰਮਾਤ੍ਮਨੇ ਨਮਃ is a traditional way to begin a new section, expressing reverence and setting a contemplative tone.

The distinction between ਕ੍ਸ਼ੇਤ੍ਰ and ਕ੍ਸ਼ੇਤ੍ਰਜ੍ਞ is central to the teachings of ਆਦਿ ਸ਼ਂਕਰਾਚਾਰ੍ਯ and ਸ਼੍ਰੀ ਰਾਮਾਨੁਜਾਚਾਰ੍ਯ. ਆਦਿ ਸ਼ਂਕਰਾਚਾਰ੍ਯ explains that the ਕ੍ਸ਼ੇਤ੍ਰ comprises the body, senses, and mind-the mutable field of experience-while the ਕ੍ਸ਼ੇਤ੍ਰਜ੍ਞ is the immutable pure consciousness that illumines this field. In contrast, ਸ਼੍ਰੀ ਰਾਮਾਨੁਜਾਚਾਰ੍ਯ expands this understanding by identifying the Supreme Self as the ultimate ਕ੍ਸ਼ੇਤ੍ਰਜ੍ਞ present within all beings, transcending individual selves. This distinction is not merely philosophical but practical, as it underlies the process of self-realization and detachment. The Upanishadic injunction ਤਮਸੋ ਮਾ ਜ੍ਯੋਤਿਰ੍ਗਮਯ from the ਚਕ੍ਸ਼ੁਸ਼ੋਪਨਿਸ਼ਦ੍ beautifully encapsulates this journey-from ignorance embodied in the field to the light of consciousness as the knower. Recognizing this difference prepares the seeker to observe the field without attachment, paving the way for the practical applications of this wisdom in daily life.

In modern life, this distinction can be reflected in how we identify ourselves. For example, when facing stress at work, recognizing that our thoughts and emotions are part of the 'field' while our awareness remains separate can help us respond more calmly. Similarly, in relationships, understanding that our roles and interactions are aspects of the field, but our true self is the observer, can reduce conflict and increase empathy. As a reflection exercise, try to observe your thoughts and bodily sensations for a few minutes each day, reminding yourself that you are the knower, not the field itself. This practice can foster clarity and inner peace.

ਅਰ੍ਜੁਨ ਉਵਾਚ
ਪ੍ਰਕ੍ਰੁਰੁਇਤਿਂ ਪੁਰੁਸ਼ਂ ਚੈਵ ਕ੍ਸ਼ੇਤ੍ਰਂ ਕ੍ਸ਼ੇਤ੍ਰਜ੍ਞਮੇਵ ਚ ।
ਏਤਤ੍ ਵੇਦਿਤੁਮਿਚ੍ਛਾਮਿ ਜ੍ਞਾਨਂ ਜ੍ਞੇਯਂ ਚ ਕੇਸ਼ਵ ॥0॥

Meaning (ਪਦਾਰ੍ਥ):
ਅਰ੍ਜੁਨ - Arjuna (the questioner)
ਉਵਾਚ - said
ਪ੍ਰਕ੍ਰੁਰੁਇਤਿਂ (ਪ੍ਰਕ੍ਰੁਰੁਇਤਿਂ) - nature, material cause
ਪੁਰੁਸ਼ਂ (ਪੁਰੁਸ਼ਂ) - spirit, conscious self
ਚ - and
ਏਵ - indeed, also
ਕ੍ਸ਼ੇਤ੍ਰਂ (ਕ੍ਸ਼ੇਤ੍ਰਂ) - the field, body or realm of experience
ਕ੍ਸ਼ੇਤ੍ਰਜ੍ਞਂ (ਕ੍ਸ਼ੇਤ੍ਰਜ੍ਞਂ) - knower of the field, the conscious principle within
ਏਤਤ੍ - this
ਵੇਦਿਤੁਮ੍ - to know, to understand
ਇਚ੍ਛਾਮਿ - I wish, I desire
ਜ੍ਞਾਨਂ - knowledge, the means of knowing
ਜ੍ਞੇਯਂ - that which is to be known, the object of true knowledge
ਚ - and
ਕੇਸ਼ਵ - O Kesava (Krishna, addressed by Arjuna)

Translation (ਭਾਵਾਰ੍ਥ):
Arjuna said: O Kesava, I wish to understand what is meant by nature and spirit, the field and its knower, as well as knowledge and what should be known.

Commentary (ਅਨੁਸਂਧਾਨ):
This verse opens with Arjuna's inquiry, highlighting his desire to comprehend several foundational concepts: ਪ੍ਰਕ੍ਰੁਰੁਇਤਿ (nature), ਪੁਰੁਸ਼ (spirit), ਕ੍ਸ਼ੇਤ੍ਰ (the field), ਕ੍ਸ਼ੇਤ੍ਰਜ੍ਞ (knower of the field), ਜ੍ਞਾਨਂ (knowledge), and ਜ੍ਞੇਯਂ (that which is to be known). By listing these terms, Arjuna signals a shift in the conversation toward the philosophical underpinnings of existence and consciousness. The use of ਵੇਦਿਤੁਂ ਇਚ੍ਛਾਮਿ-'I wish to know'-shows his earnestness and humility as a seeker. Each term represents a distinct aspect of reality: the material, the conscious, the body, the self, the process of knowing, and the ultimate object of knowledge. This sets the stage for a deep exploration of the relationship between matter and consciousness, which is central to the teachings of the thirteenth chapter.

While ਆਦਿ ਸ਼ਂਕਰਾਚਾਰ੍ਯ and ਸ਼੍ਰੀ ਰਾਮਾਨੁਜਾਚਾਰ੍ਯ do not provide commentary on this verse in their principal works, ਸ਼੍ਰੀ ਮਧ੍ਵਾਚਾਰ੍ਯ highlights it as a crucial turning point where Arjuna explicitly seeks to understand the fundamental distinction between ਪ੍ਰਕ੍ਰੁਰੁਇਤਿ (nature) and ਪੁਰੁਸ਼ (spirit), or the ਕ੍ਸ਼ੇਤ੍ਰ (field) and the ਕ੍ਸ਼ੇਤ੍ਰਜ੍ਞ (knower of the field). This inquiry initiates Krishna's profound teaching on the difference between the perishable body and the imperishable self. The importance of this quest for true knowledge is underscored by the Upanishadic prayer from the ਬ੍ਰੁਰੁਇਹਦਾਰਣ੍ਯਕ ਉਪਨਿਸ਼ਦ੍: ਅਸਤੋ ਮਾ ਸਦ੍ਗਮਯ, meaning 'Lead me from the unreal to the real.' This invocation captures the essence of Arjuna's request-to transcend ignorance and confusion about the self and the world. By framing the question in this way, the verse prepares the listener for a systematic exploration of self-realization, which naturally leads into practical reflections on identity and consciousness in daily life.

In modern life, this verse mirrors the questions many people ask about the difference between their physical existence and their inner consciousness. For example, a scientist might wonder about the boundary between brain activity and subjective experience, while a person facing a major life change might ask what truly defines their identity beyond their circumstances. Another example is someone exploring meditation, seeking to understand the difference between their thoughts (the field) and the awareness observing those thoughts (the knower). As a reflection exercise, consider what you identify with most: your body, your thoughts, or the awareness behind them. How does this shape your sense of self and your approach to knowledge?

ਸ਼੍ਰੀ ਭਗਵਾਨੁਵਾਚ
ਇਦਂ ਸ਼ਰੀਰਂ ਕੌਂਤੇਯ ਕ੍ਸ਼ੇਤ੍ਰਮਿਤ੍ਯਭਿਧੀਯਤੇ ।
ਏਤਦ੍ਯੋ ਵੇਤ੍ਤਿ ਤਂ ਪ੍ਰਾਹੁਃ ਕ੍ਸ਼ੇਤ੍ਰਜ੍ਞ ਇਤਿ ਤਦ੍ਵਿਦਃ ॥1॥

Meaning (ਪਦਾਰ੍ਥ):
ਇਦਂ - this
ਸ਼ਰੀਰਂ - body
ਕੌਂਤੇਯ - O son of Kunti (Arjuna)
ਕ੍ਸ਼ੇਤ੍ਰਂ - field
ਇਤਿ - thus
ਅਭਿਧੀਯਤੇ - is called
ਏਤਤ੍ - this
ਯਃ - who
ਵੇਤ੍ਤਿ - knows
ਤਂ - him
ਪ੍ਰਾਹੁਃ - they call
ਕ੍ਸ਼ੇਤ੍ਰਜ੍ਞ - knower of the field
ਇਤਿ - thus
ਤਦ੍ਵਿਦਃ - those who understand (the wise)

Translation (ਭਾਵਾਰ੍ਥ):
The Blessed Lord said: Arjuna, this body is referred to as the field. One who understands this field is called the knower of the field by those who are wise.

Commentary (ਅਨੁਸਂਧਾਨ):
This verse introduces the concepts of ਸ਼ਰੀਰਂ (body), ਕ੍ਸ਼ੇਤ੍ਰਂ (field), and ਕ੍ਸ਼ੇਤ੍ਰਜ੍ਞ (knower of the field). Here, Krishna addresses Arjuna as ਕੌਂਤੇਯ, emphasizing his identity as the son of Kunti and drawing his attention to the teaching. The term ਕ੍ਸ਼ੇਤ੍ਰਂ is used metaphorically to represent the body as a field where experiences and actions take place. The phrase ਕ੍ਸ਼ੇਤ੍ਰਜ੍ਞ refers to the conscious principle that is aware of and experiences the body. The wise, indicated by ਤਦ੍ਵਿਦਃ, recognize this distinction between the body and its conscious knower. This sets the stage for a deeper exploration of the relationship between matter and consciousness.

Although ਆਦਿ ਸ਼ਂਕਰਾਚਾਰ੍ਯ and ਸ਼੍ਰੀ ਰਾਮਾਨੁਜਾਚਾਰ੍ਯ do not provide commentary on this verse, ਸ਼੍ਰੀ ਮਧ੍ਵਾਚਾਰ੍ਯ and ਮਧੁਸੂਦਨ ਸਰਸ੍ਵਤੀ elucidate the essential distinction between ਕ੍ਸ਼ੇਤ੍ਰਂ (the body or field) and ਕ੍ਸ਼ੇਤ੍ਰਜ੍ਞ (the knower of the field). ਮਧੁਸੂਦਨ ਸਰਸ੍ਵਤੀ emphasizes that true wisdom arises from recognizing the self as the conscious observer, separate from the physical body which merely serves as the field of experience. Similarly, ਸ਼੍ਰੀ ਮਧ੍ਵਾਚਾਰ੍ਯ highlights that the ਕ੍ਸ਼ੇਤ੍ਰਜ੍ਞ is the immutable witness, distinct from the mutable ਕ੍ਸ਼ੇਤ੍ਰਂ. This distinction aligns with the Upanishadic teaching ਨ ਜਾਯਤੇ ਮ੍ਰਿਯਤੇ ਵਾ ਵਿਪਸ਼੍ਚਿਤ੍ from the ਕਠੋਪਨਿਸ਼ਦ੍ (1.2.18), which means the true self neither takes birth nor dies, underscoring its eternal and unchanging nature. Understanding this difference is foundational for spiritual progress, as it shifts identification from the transient body to the eternal knower, preparing one to apply this insight practically in daily life.

In modern life, this teaching can be applied by recognizing that our bodies and circumstances are like fields in which we act, but our true identity lies in the awareness that observes and experiences these actions. For example, when facing illness or physical discomfort, remembering that the body is the field and not the self can help maintain inner peace. Similarly, in situations of emotional turmoil, identifying with the knower rather than the changing experiences can provide stability. As a reflection exercise, try to observe your thoughts and sensations for a few minutes each day, reminding yourself that you are the witness, not the body or mind. This practice can gradually shift your sense of identity toward the deeper self.

ਕ੍ਸ਼ੇਤ੍ਰਜ੍ਞਂ ਚਾਪਿ ਮਾਂ ਵਿਦ੍ਧਿ ਸਰ੍ਵਕ੍ਸ਼ੇਤ੍ਰੇਸ਼ੁ ਭਾਰਤ ।
ਕ੍ਸ਼ੇਤ੍ਰਕ੍ਸ਼ੇਤ੍ਰਜ੍ਞਯੋਰ੍ਜ੍ਞਾਨਂ ਯਤ੍ਤਜ੍ਜ੍ਞਾਨਂ ਮਤਂ ਮਮ ॥2॥

Meaning (ਪਦਾਰ੍ਥ):
ਕ੍ਸ਼ੇਤ੍ਰਜ੍ਞਂ - the knower of the field (accusative singular, refers to the conscious self)
ਚ - and
ਅਪਿ - also
ਮਾਂ - me (Krishna, the Supreme Self)
ਵਿਦ੍ਧਿ - know (imperative, instructing Arjuna)
ਸਰ੍ਵ-ਕ੍ਸ਼ੇਤ੍ਰੇਸ਼ੁ - in all fields (locative plural, all bodies)
ਭਾਰਤ - O descendant of Bharata (Arjuna)
ਕ੍ਸ਼ੇਤ੍ਰ-ਕ੍ਸ਼ੇਤ੍ਰਜ੍ਞਯੋਹ੍ - of the field and the knower of the field (genitive dual)
ਜ੍ਞਾਨਂ - knowledge (accusative singular)
ਯਤ੍ - which
ਤਤ੍ - that
ਜ੍ਞਾਨਂ - knowledge (repeated for emphasis)
ਮਤਂ - is considered (by me)
ਮਮ - by me (Krishna)

Translation (ਭਾਵਾਰ੍ਥ):
Know, Arjuna, that I am the knower of the field in all bodies. Understanding the distinction between the field and its knower is what I consider to be true knowledge.

Commentary (ਅਨੁਸਂਧਾਨ):
This verse introduces the terms ਕ੍ਸ਼ੇਤ੍ਰ (field), ਕ੍ਸ਼ੇਤ੍ਰਜ੍ਞ (knower of the field), and ਜ੍ਞਾਨਂ (knowledge), which are central to the teachings of this chapter. The 'field' refers to the body, the physical and mental domain in which experiences occur. The 'knower of the field' is the conscious principle, the self that observes and experiences the body and mind. Krishna instructs Arjuna to recognize that the true knower in every body is ultimately the same Supreme Self, and that understanding the difference between the body (as an object) and the conscious self (as the subject) is essential knowledge. The verse also emphasizes that this insight is not just theoretical but foundational for spiritual growth.

ਆਦਿ ਸ਼ਂਕਰਾਚਾਰ੍ਯ elucidates that the body is termed ਕ੍ਸ਼ੇਤ੍ਰ because it serves as the field where all actions and experiences take place, while the ਕ੍ਸ਼ੇਤ੍ਰਜ੍ਞ is the conscious witness distinct from this field. Similarly, ਸ਼੍ਰੀ ਰਾਮਾਨੁਜਾਚਾਰ੍ਯ emphasizes that the self is the true experiencer, separate from the body, and that realizing this distinction is essential for liberation. This understanding aligns with the Upanishadic teaching ਨ ਜਾਯਤੇ ਮ੍ਰਿਯਤੇ ਵਾ ਵਿਪਸ਼੍ਚਿਤ੍ from the ਕਠੋਪਨਿਸ਼ਦ੍ (1.2.18), which means the self neither takes birth nor dies, highlighting its eternal nature beyond the transient body. Together, these insights deepen the knowledge introduced in the first paragraph and prepare us to apply this awareness practically, as discussed next.

In modern life, this teaching encourages us to see ourselves not just as our bodies or minds, but as the conscious observer behind all experiences. For example, when facing stress at work, remembering that you are the witness of your thoughts and emotions can help create space and reduce reactivity. When dealing with illness or aging, this perspective helps maintain inner peace by recognizing that the body is a temporary field, not the true self. As a reflection exercise, try to observe your thoughts and sensations for a few minutes each day, asking yourself: Who is aware of these experiences? This simple inquiry can foster a deeper sense of self-awareness and resilience.

ਤਤ੍ਕ੍ਸ਼ੇਤ੍ਰਂ ਯਚ੍ਚ ਯਾਦ੍ਰੁਰੁਇਕ੍ਚ ਯਦ੍ਵਿਕਾਰਿ ਯਤਸ਼੍ਚ ਯਤ੍ ।
ਸ ਚ ਯੋ ਯਤ੍ਪ੍ਰਭਾਵਸ਼੍ਚ ਤਤ੍ਸਮਾਸੇਨ ਮੇ ਸ਼੍ਰੁਰੁਇਣੁ ॥3॥

Meaning (ਪਦਾਰ੍ਥ):
ਤਤ੍ - that
ਕ੍ਸ਼ੇਤ੍ਰਂ - field (body or matter)
ਯਤ੍ - which
ਚ - and
ਯਾਦ੍ਰੁਰੁਇਕ੍ - of what kind
ਚ - and
ਯਤ੍ - which
ਵਿਕਾਰਿ - what modifications
ਯਤਃ - from what cause
ਚ - and
ਯਤ੍ - which
ਸਃ - he
ਚ - and
ਯਃ - who
ਯਤ੍ਪ੍ਰਭਾਵਃ - whose influence or power
ਚ - and
ਤਤ੍ - that
ਸਮਾਸੇਨ - briefly, in summary
ਮੇ - from me
ਸ਼੍ਰੁਰੁਇਣੁ - listen

Translation (ਭਾਵਾਰ੍ਥ):
Now listen as I explain to you, in brief, what the field is, its nature, its changes, its origin, and also who the knower of the field is and what powers they possess.

Commentary (ਅਨੁਸਂਧਾਨ):
This verse introduces several important terms: ਕ੍ਸ਼ੇਤ੍ਰਂ (field), ਵਿਕਾਰਿ (modifications), ਪ੍ਰਭਾਵ (influence or power), and ਸ਼੍ਰੁਰੁਇਣੁ (listen). Here, ਕ੍ਸ਼ੇਤ੍ਰਂ refers to the body or the realm of experience, which is subject to change and transformation, indicated by ਵਿਕਾਰਿ. The word ਪ੍ਰਭਾਵ points to the unique qualities or powers that arise from the interaction of the field and its knower. Krishna is inviting Arjuna to pay close attention (ਸ਼੍ਰੁਰੁਇਣੁ) as he is about to summarize the essential characteristics of both the field and its knower, setting the stage for a deeper understanding of the relationship between matter and consciousness. The verse emphasizes that knowing the nature, changes, and source of the field, as well as the identity and influence of its knower, is crucial for true knowledge.

The verse's delineation of ਕ੍ਸ਼ੇਤ੍ਰਂ and its ਪ੍ਰਭਾਵ invites nuanced interpretation by revered Acharyas. ਆਦਿ ਸ਼ਂਕਰਾਚਾਰ੍ਯ elucidates that the ਕ੍ਸ਼ੇਤ੍ਰਂ includes all mutable physical and mental phenomena, while the ਕ੍ਸ਼ੇਤ੍ਰਜ੍ਨ is the immutable consciousness that illuminates them, emphasizing their essential non-duality. In contrast, ਸ਼੍ਰੀ ਰਾਮਾਨੁਜਾਚਾਰ੍ਯ teaches that both the field and its knower are inseparable from the Supreme Lord, who dwells as the inner controller in all beings, thus affirming their divine unity. This understanding is supported by the Upanishadic injunction ਤਮਸੋ ਮਾ ਜ੍ਯੋਤਿਰ੍ਗਮਯ from the ਬ੍ਰੁਰੁਇਹਦਾਰਣ੍ਯਕ ਉਪਨਿਸ਼ਦ੍, which means 'lead me from darkness to light,' symbolizing the movement from ignorance of the field and knower to true knowledge. These perspectives deepen the foundational insight introduced in the first paragraph and prepare us to apply this knowledge practically by discerning the changing field from the unchanging knower, as discussed next.

In modern life, this teaching can be applied by observing how our bodies and minds are constantly changing, yet there is an unchanging awareness that experiences these changes. For example, when you notice your emotions shifting throughout the day, or your body aging over the years, you can reflect on the presence of a witnessing consciousness that remains steady. Another example is in relationships: recognizing that both you and others are more than just your roles or appearances can foster empathy and deeper connection. As a reflection exercise, take a few minutes to sit quietly and observe your thoughts and sensations, asking yourself: Who is aware of these experiences? This practice can help you distinguish between the ever-changing field and the stable knower within.

ਰੁਰੁਇਸ਼ਿਭਿਰ੍ਬਹੁਧਾ ਗੀਤਂ ਛਂਦੋਭਿਰ੍ਵਿਵਿਧੈਃ ਪ੍ਰੁਰੁਇਥਕ੍ ।
ਬ੍ਰਹ੍ਮਸੂਤ੍ਰਪਦੈਸ਼੍ਚੈਵ ਹੇਤੁਮਦ੍ਭਿਰ੍ਵਿਨਿਸ਼੍ਚਿਤੈਃ ॥4॥

Meaning (ਪਦਾਰ੍ਥ):
ਰੁਰੁਇਸ਼ਿਭਿਃ - by sages
ਬਹੁਧਾ - in many ways
ਗੀਤਂ - has been sung (taught, explained)
ਛਂਦੋਭਿਃ - by Vedic meters (hymns)
ਵਿਵਿਧੈਃ - of various kinds
ਪ੍ਰੁਰੁਇਥਕ੍ - separately (distinctly, individually)
ਬ੍ਰਹ੍ਮਸੂਤ੍ਰਪਦੈਃ - by the words of the Brahma Sutras
ਚ - and
ਏਵ - indeed
ਹੇਤੁਮਦ੍ਭਿਃ - with reasoning (logical arguments)
ਵਿਨਿਸ਼੍ਚਿਤੈਃ - ascertained (established, determined)

Translation (ਭਾਵਾਰ੍ਥ):
The sages have explained this subject in many ways, using diverse Vedic hymns and also through the logical and definitive statements of the Brahma Sutras.

Commentary (ਅਨੁਸਂਧਾਨ):
This verse highlights the importance of tradition and scriptural authority in understanding the nature of the field and its knower. The terms ਰੁਰੁਇਸ਼ਿਭਿਃ (by sages), ਛਂਦੋਭਿਃ (by Vedic meters), ਬ੍ਰਹ੍ਮਸੂਤ੍ਰਪਦੈਃ (by the words of the Brahma Sutras), and ਹੇਤੁਮਦ੍ਭਿਃ ਵਿਨਿਸ਼੍ਚਿਤੈਃ (with logical certainty) all point to different sources and methods of knowledge. The field and its knower are not just topics for speculation; they have been rigorously examined and articulated by wise teachers through poetic hymns, systematic treatises, and logical reasoning. This verse reassures the listener that the teachings about the field and its knower are not arbitrary but are grounded in a long-standing and multifaceted tradition of inquiry.

ਆਦਿ ਸ਼ਂਕਰਾਚਾਰ੍ਯ elucidates that the knowledge of the ਕ੍ਸ਼ੇਤ੍ਰ (field) and ਕ੍ਸ਼ੇਤ੍ਰ-ਜ੍ਞ (knower of the field) is firmly grounded in both scriptural revelation and logical inquiry, demonstrating the essential harmony between ਪ੍ਰਮਾਣ (means of knowledge) and ਤਰ੍ਕ (reasoning). Meanwhile, ਸ਼੍ਰੀ ਮਧ੍ਵਾਚਾਰ੍ਯ stresses the significance of ਹੇਤੁਮਦ੍ਭਿਃ ਵਿਨਿਸ਼੍ਚਿਤੈਃ-logical certainty-emphasizing that scriptural testimony must be complemented by rigorous analysis to dispel doubt and establish truth. This dual approach reflects the teaching of the ਕਠੋਪਨਿਸ਼ਦ੍ (1.2.18): ਨ ਜਾਯਤੇ ਮ੍ਰਿਯਤੇ ਵਾ ਵਿਪਸ਼੍ਚਿਤ੍, which assures the eternal nature of the self beyond birth and death, a truth apprehended through both revealed knowledge and discriminative reasoning. Thus, the verse continues the theme introduced in paragraph one by affirming that the understanding of the field and its knower is not mere speculation but a well-founded synthesis of diverse authoritative sources, preparing us to apply this integrated wisdom practically, as discussed in the following paragraph.

In modern life, this verse encourages us to seek knowledge from multiple credible sources rather than relying on a single perspective. For example, when making a significant decision, one might consult scientific research, expert opinions, and personal experience, much like the sages used hymns, treatises, and logic. In academic or professional settings, integrating insights from different disciplines can lead to a more complete understanding of complex issues. As a reflection exercise, consider a topic you care about deeply. List three different sources or methods you could use to understand it better, and notice how each adds a unique dimension to your knowledge.

ਮਹਾਭੂਤਾਨ੍ਯਹਂਕਾਰਃ ਬੁਦ੍ਧਿਰਵ੍ਯਕ੍ਤਮੇਵ ਚ ।
ਇਂਦ੍ਰਿਯਾਣਿ ਦਸ਼ੈਕਂ ਚ ਪਂਚ ਚੇਂਦ੍ਰਿਯਗੋਚਰਾਃ ॥5॥

Meaning (ਪਦਾਰ੍ਥ):
ਮਹਾਭੂਤਾਨਿ - the great elements (earth, water, fire, air, space)
ਅਹਂਕਾਰਃ - ego-sense, the sense of individuality
ਬੁਦ੍ਧਿਃ - intellect, faculty of discrimination
ਅਵ੍ਯਕ੍ਤਮ੍ - the unmanifest, primal matter (ਪ੍ਰਕ੍ਰੁਰੁਇਤਿ in its subtle state)
ਏਵ - indeed, certainly
ਚ - and
ਇਂਦ੍ਰਿਯਾਣਿ - the senses (organs of perception and action)
ਦਸ਼ - ten
ਏਕਮ੍ - one (the mind)
ਪਂਚ - five
ਚ - and
ਇਂਦ੍ਰਿਯ-ਗੋਚਰਾਃ - objects of the senses

Translation (ਭਾਵਾਰ੍ਥ):
The five great elements, the sense of ego, the intellect, the unmanifest, the ten senses and the mind, and the five objects of the senses-these together make up the field.

Commentary (ਅਨੁਸਂਧਾਨ):
This verse lists the fundamental components that make up the 'field' or ਕ੍ਸ਼ੇਤ੍ਰ. The key terms here are ਮਹਾਭੂਤਾਨਿ (the five great elements: earth, water, fire, air, and space), ਅਹਂਕਾਰਃ (ego-sense), ਬੁਦ੍ਧਿਃ (intellect), and ਅਵ੍ਯਕ੍ਤਮ੍ (the unmanifest, referring to the subtle, undifferentiated state of matter). The verse also mentions the ten ਇਂਦ੍ਰਿਯਾਣਿ (senses, which include both organs of perception and action), the mind as the eleventh, and the five sense-objects (sound, touch, form, taste, smell). Together, these form the basic building blocks of the physical and psychological world that the individual experiences. By enumerating these, the Gita sets the stage for distinguishing between the body-mind complex and the true self.

ਆਦਿ ਸ਼ਂਕਰਾਚਾਰ੍ਯ explains that the enumeration of the ਮਹਾਭੂਤਾਨਿ, ਅਹਂਕਾਰਃ, ਬੁਦ੍ਧਿਃ, ਅਵ੍ਯਕ੍ਤਮ੍, and the senses in this verse is a profound teaching echoed throughout the Vedic tradition, emphasizing the distinction between the transient body-mind complex and the eternal self. ਸ਼੍ਰੀ ਰਾਮਾਨੁਜਾਚਾਰ੍ਯ further elucidates that these elements constitute the ਕ੍ਸ਼ੇਤ੍ਰ or field, which is distinct from the ਕ੍ਸ਼ੇਤ੍ਰਜ੍ਨ, the conscious soul that illumines the field. This distinction is vital for spiritual inquiry and liberation. The Upanishadic prayer ਮ੍ਰੁਰੁਇਤ੍ਯੋਰ੍ਮਾ ਅਮ੍ਰੁਰੁਇਤਂ ਗਮਯ from the ਬ੍ਰੁਰੁਇਹਦਾਰਣ੍ਯਕ ਉਪਨਿਸ਼ਦ੍ beautifully captures this aspiration, meaning 'Lead me from death to immortality,' signifying the seeker's journey beyond the perishable components of existence toward the imperishable self. This verse thus prepares the aspirant to recognize the layered nature of material existence, setting the foundation for practical reflection on the self beyond the body and mind.

In modern life, this teaching can be reflected in how we identify ourselves with our bodies, thoughts, and emotions. For example, when someone feels insulted, they may react as if their very being is threatened, forgetting that the true self is distinct from the mind and ego. Another example is the pursuit of sensory pleasures, where people often equate happiness with satisfying the senses, not realizing these are just interactions within the 'field'. A practical reflection exercise: Take a few moments to observe your thoughts and sensations. Ask yourself, 'Am I the body, the mind, or the observer of these experiences?' This simple inquiry can help create distance from habitual identification with the field and open the door to deeper self-understanding.

ਇਚ੍ਛਾ ਦ੍ਵੇਸ਼ਃ ਸੁਖਂ ਦੁਃਖਂ ਸਂਘਾਤਸ਼੍ਚੇਤਨਾ ਧ੍ਰੁਰੁਇਤਿਃ ।
ਏਤਤ੍ਕ੍ਸ਼ੇਤ੍ਰਂ ਸਮਾਸੇਨ ਸਵਿਕਾਰਮੁਦਾਹ੍ਰੁਰੁਇਤਮ੍ ॥6॥

Meaning (ਪਦਾਰ੍ਥ):
ਇਚ੍ਛ - desire
ਦ੍ਵੇਸ਼ - aversion or hatred
ਸੁਖਂ - pleasure, happiness
ਦੁਃਖਂ - pain, suffering
ਸਂਘਾਤਃ - aggregate, physical body-complex
ਚੇਤਨਾ - consciousness, sentience
ਧ੍ਰੁਰੁਇਤਿਃ - firmness, perseverance
ਏਤਤ੍ - this
ਕ੍ਸ਼ੇਤ੍ਰਂ - field (body-mind complex)
ਸਮਾਸੇਨ - in summary, briefly
ਸਵਿਕਾਰਮ੍ - with modifications
ਉਦਾਹ੍ਰੁਰੁਇਤਮ੍ - is described, is stated

Translation (ਭਾਵਾਰ੍ਥ):
Desire, aversion, pleasure, pain, the physical body as an aggregate, consciousness, and steadfastness-these, along with their various changes, are briefly described as the field.

Commentary (ਅਨੁਸਂਧਾਨ):
This verse lists several important aspects of the 'field' or ਕ੍ਸ਼ੇਤ੍ਰਂ, which refers to the body-mind complex. The words ਇਚ੍ਛ (desire) and ਦ੍ਵੇਸ਼ (aversion) highlight the emotional responses that drive human behavior. ਸੁਖਂ (pleasure) and ਦੁਃਖਂ (pain) point to the dual experiences that color our lives. The term ਸਂਘਾਤਃ refers to the aggregate or assembly of physical and subtle components that make up the individual, while ਚੇਤਨਾ (consciousness) is the awareness that animates this aggregate. ਧ੍ਰੁਰੁਇਤਿਃ (steadfastness or perseverance) is the capacity to endure and maintain focus. The verse summarizes that all these, with their modifications, constitute the field, emphasizing the dynamic and composite nature of embodied existence.

The distinction between the ਕ੍ਸ਼ੇਤ੍ਰਂ and the ਜੀਵਾਤ੍ਮਨ੍ is crucial in understanding this verse, as explained by ਆਦਿ ਸ਼ਂਕਰਾਚਾਰ੍ਯ and ਸ਼੍ਰੀ ਰਾਮਾਨੁਜਾਚਾਰ੍ਯ. ਆਦਿ ਸ਼ਂਕਰਾਚਾਰ੍ਯ clarifies that qualities such as ਇਚ੍ਛ (desire) and ਦ੍ਵੇਸ਼ (aversion) are modifications of the field, not inherent to the pure self, which is unchanging consciousness. He interprets ਚੇਤਨਾ here as reflected consciousness associated with the mind-body complex, distinct from the immutable ਜੀਵਾਤ੍ਮਨ੍. Meanwhile, ਸ਼੍ਰੀ ਰਾਮਾਨੁਜਾਚਾਰ੍ਯ emphasizes that the aggregate (ਸਂਘਾਤਃ) serves as the substratum for experiencing pleasure and pain, enabling the soul's interaction with the world and its spiritual evolution. This understanding aligns with the Upanishadic injunction ਤਮਸੋ ਮਾ ਜ੍ਯੋਤਿਰ੍ਗਮਯ from the ਬ੍ਰੁਰੁਇਹਦਾਰਣ੍ਯਕ ਊਪਨਿਸ਼ਦ੍, which means 'Lead me from darkness to light,' symbolizing the movement from ignorance of the self's true nature to the illumination of self-knowledge. Recognizing these qualities as attributes of the field rather than the self provides a foundation for the practical reflection on desires and emotions discussed next.

In modern life, these concepts are highly relevant. For example, when someone feels intense desire for a new gadget or experiences aversion toward a difficult colleague, they are witnessing ਇਚ੍ਛ and ਦ੍ਵੇਸ਼ in action. The ups and downs of daily life-joy at a promotion or disappointment after a setback-are expressions of ਸੁਖਂ and ਦੁਃਖਂ. The ability to persevere through a challenging project reflects ਧ੍ਰੁਰੁਇਤਿਃ. A practical reflection exercise: Take a few minutes each evening to notice which desires, aversions, pleasures, and pains influenced your actions that day. Observe how these experiences arise within the 'field' of your body and mind, and consider how recognizing them as modifications of the field can help you respond with greater awareness and balance.

ਅਮਾਨਿਤ੍ਵਮਦਂਭਿਤ੍ਵਮ੍ ਅਹਿਂਸਾ ਕ੍ਸ਼ਾਂਤਿਰਾਰ੍ਜਵਮ੍ ।
ਆਚਾਰ੍ਯੋਪਾਸਨਂ ਸ਼ੌਚਂ ਸ੍ਥੈਰ੍ਯਮਾਤ੍ਮਵਿਨਿਗ੍ਰਹਃ ॥7॥

Meaning (ਪਦਾਰ੍ਥ):
ਅਮਾਨਿਤ੍ਵ - absence of pride (amAnitvam)
ਅਦਂਭਿਤ੍ਵ - absence of hypocrisy (adambhitvam)
ਅਹਿਂਸਾ - non-violence
ਕ੍ਸ਼ਾਂਤਿ - forbearance, patience (kShAntiH)
ਆਰ੍ਜਵ - straightforwardness, sincerity (Arjavam)
ਆਚਾਰ੍ਯ ਉਪਾਸਨ - reverence for the teacher (AchAryopAsanam)
ਸੌਚ - purity, cleanliness (Saucham)
ਸ੍ਥੈਰ੍ਯ - steadiness, firmness (sthairyam)
ਆਤ੍ਮ ਵਿਨਿਗ੍ਰਹ - self-control (AtmavinigrahaH)

Translation (ਭਾਵਾਰ੍ਥ):
Humility, honesty, non-violence, patience, sincerity, devotion to one's teacher, cleanliness, steadiness, and self-control are qualities that make up the field of experience.

Commentary (ਅਨੁਸਂਧਾਨ):
This verse lists several foundational qualities that shape a person's inner landscape, or what is called the 'field' in this chapter. The terms ਅਮਾਨਿਤ੍ਵ (humility) and ਅਦਂਭਿਤ੍ਵ (honesty) point to a mindset free from arrogance and pretense. ਅਹਿਂਸਾ (non-violence) extends beyond physical action to include non-harmful thoughts and words. ਕ੍ਸ਼ਾਂਤਿ (patience) and ਆਰ੍ਜਵ (sincerity) emphasize the importance of enduring difficulties calmly and maintaining integrity. The phrase ਆਚਾਰ੍ਯ ਉਪਾਸਨ (reverence for the teacher) highlights the value of learning from a spiritual guide, while ਸੌਚ (cleanliness) refers to both external and internal purity. ਸ੍ਥੈਰ੍ਯ (steadiness) and ਆਤ੍ਮ ਵਿਨਿਗ੍ਰਹ (self-control) round out the list, underscoring the need for stability and discipline in one's actions and emotions. Together, these qualities are described as modifications or expressions of the field, shaping how one experiences and interacts with the world.

The qualities enumerated in this verse are understood by ਆਦਿ ਸ਼ਂਕਰਾਚਾਰ੍ਯ as attributes of the ਕ੍ਸੇਤ੍ਰ, the body-mind complex, which are objects of knowledge rather than the true Self. He teaches that cultivating these virtues purifies the mind, enabling it to become a steady instrument for self-inquiry and realization. Meanwhile, ਸ਼੍ਰੀ ਰਾਮਾਨੁਜਾਚਾਰ੍ਯ interprets these qualities as arising from the association of the Self with the body and emphasizes their indispensable role in spiritual progress. He particularly stresses ਆਚਾਰ੍ਯ ਉਪਾਸਨ-reverence for the spiritual teacher-as essential for receiving correct guidance on the path. This understanding aligns with the Upanishadic injunction ਉਤ੍ਤਿਸ਼੍ਠਤ ਜਾਗ੍ਰਤ ਪ੍ਰਾਪ੍ਯ ਵਰਾਨ੍ਨਿਬੋਧਤ from the ਕਠੋਪਨਿਸ਼ਦ੍ (1.3.14), which exhorts one to 'Arise, awake, and learn the excellent wisdom.' Thus, these virtues form the foundation for steady practice and prepare the aspirant to engage deeply with the teachings, bridging the inner qualities described here with their practical application in daily life.

In modern life, these qualities can be seen in various contexts: practicing humility at work by acknowledging others' contributions, showing patience when dealing with difficult situations or people, and maintaining honesty even when it is inconvenient. For example, a student might demonstrate ਆਚਾਰ੍ਯ ਉਪਾਸਨ by respecting and learning sincerely from a mentor, while a professional might practice ਆਤ੍ਮ ਵਿਨਿਗ੍ਰਹ by managing impulses and staying focused on long-term goals. As a reflection exercise, consider which of these qualities you find most challenging to embody in your daily life. Take a few minutes to identify one situation where you could apply greater patience or sincerity, and plan a small action to cultivate that quality in the coming week.

ਇਂਦ੍ਰਿਯਾਰ੍ਥੇਸ਼ੁ ਵੈਰਾਗ੍ਯਮ੍ ਅਨਹਂਕਾਰ ਏਵ ਚ ।
ਜਨ੍ਮਮ੍ਰੁਰੁਇਤ੍ਯੁਜਰਾਵ੍ਯਾਧਿ-ਦੁਃਖਦੋਸ਼ਾਨੁਦਰ੍ਸ਼ਨਮ੍ ॥8॥

Meaning (ਪਦਾਰ੍ਥ):
ਇਂਦ੍ਰਿਯ - sense organ
ਅਰ੍ਥ (in ਇਂਦ੍ਰਿਯਾਰ੍ਥੇਸ਼ੁ) - objects of the senses
ਵੈਰਾਗ੍ਯ - detachment, dispassion
ਅਨਹਂਕਾਰ - absence of ego, non-egoism
ਏਵ - indeed, also
ਚ - and
ਜਨ੍ਮ - birth
ਮ੍ਰੁਰੁਇਤ੍ਯੁ - death
ਜਰਾ - old age
ਵ੍ਯਾਧਿ - disease
ਦੁਃਖ - suffering
ਦੋਸ਼ - faults, defects
ਅਨੁਦਰ੍ਸ਼ਨ - constant reflection, seeing repeatedly

Translation (ਭਾਵਾਰ੍ਥ):
Detachment from the pleasures of the senses, freedom from pride, and the steady awareness of the pain and flaws found in birth, death, aging, and illness-these are qualities of knowledge.

Commentary (ਅਨੁਸਂਧਾਨ):
This verse highlights several key qualities that support true understanding. The phrase ਇਂਦ੍ਰਿਯਾਰ੍ਥੇਸ਼ੁ ਵੈਰਾਗ੍ਯ points to the importance of not being attached to sensory pleasures, suggesting that wisdom grows when we are not ruled by cravings. ਅਨਹਂਕਾਰ refers to the absence of ego, meaning a person does not identify with pride or a sense of superiority. The compound ਜਨ੍ਮ-ਮ੍ਰੁਰੁਇਤ੍ਯੁ-ਜਰਾ-ਵ੍ਯਾਧਿ-ਦੁਃਖ-ਦੋਸ਼-ਅਨੁਦਰ੍ਸ਼ਨਮ੍ emphasizes the need to regularly reflect on the inherent suffering and imperfections in the cycles of birth, death, old age, and disease. By recognizing these realities, one develops a deeper sense of detachment and perspective, which is essential for spiritual maturity.

ਆਦਿ ਸ਼ਂਕਰਾਚਾਰ੍ਯ explains that ਵੈਰਾਗ੍ਯ is the essential practice of withdrawing the mind from sense objects, which purifies the intellect and prepares it for higher knowledge. He emphasizes ਅਨਹਂਕਾਰ as the humble absence of egoistic pride, which allows one to receive wisdom without obstruction. Similarly, ਸ਼੍ਰੀ ਰਾਮਾਨੁਜਾਚਾਰ੍ਯ interprets detachment as refraining from finding joy in anything other than the true self, encouraging a steady reflection on the sufferings of birth, death, old age, and disease to cultivate dispassion. This aligns with the Upanishadic injunction ਮ੍ਰੁਰੁਇਤ੍ਯੋਰ੍ਮਾ ਅਮ੍ਰੁਰੁਇਤਂ ਗਮਯ from the Bhadrayaka Upanishad, which means 'lead me from death to immortality,' highlighting the transformative goal of transcending worldly suffering through detachment and humility. Together, these teachings deepen the understanding of the verse's call for inner renunciation and prepare the seeker for practical application in daily life.

In modern life, practicing detachment from sensory pleasures could mean being mindful of overindulgence in food, entertainment, or social media, and choosing moderation instead. Letting go of ego might involve accepting feedback at work without defensiveness, or not feeling the need to always be right in conversations. Regularly reflecting on the realities of aging, illness, and mortality can help us prioritize what truly matters, such as relationships and meaningful pursuits. As a reflection exercise, consider spending a few minutes each week contemplating the impermanent nature of life and how this awareness might shift your daily choices and attitudes.

ਅਸਕ੍ਤਿਰਨਭਿਸ਼੍ਵਂਗਃ ਪੁਤ੍ਰਦਾਰਗ੍ਰੁਰੁਇਹਾਦਿਸ਼ੁ ।
ਨਿਤ੍ਯਂ ਚ ਸਮਚਿਤ੍ਤਤ੍ਵਮ੍ ਇਸ਼੍ਟਾਨਿਸ਼੍ਟੋਪਪਤ੍ਤਿਸ਼ੁ ॥9॥

Meaning (ਪਦਾਰ੍ਥ):
ਅਸਕ੍ਤਿਃ - non-attachment, absence of clinging
ਅਨਭਿਸ਼੍ਵਞ੍ਗਃ - absence of possessiveness or deep attachment
ਪੁਤ੍ਰ-ਦਾਰ-ਗ੍ਰੁਰੁਇਹ-ਆਦਿਸ਼ੁ - towards children, spouse, home, and similar things
ਨਿਤ੍ਯਂ - always, constantly
ਚ - and
ਸਮ-ਚਿਤ੍ਤਤ੍ਵਮ੍ - equanimity, evenness of mind
ਇਸ਼੍ਟ-ਅਨਿਸ਼੍ਟ-ਉਪਪਤ੍ਤਿਸ਼ੁ - in the occurrence of pleasant and unpleasant situations

Translation (ਭਾਵਾਰ੍ਥ):
Freedom from attachment and possessiveness regarding children, spouse, home, and similar things; always maintaining a balanced mind in both favorable and unfavorable situations.

Commentary (ਅਨੁਸਂਧਾਨ):
This verse highlights the qualities of ਅਸਕ੍ਤਿਃ (non-attachment), ਅਨਭਿਸ਼੍ਵਞ੍ਗਃ (absence of possessiveness), and ਸਮ-ਚਿਤ੍ਤਤ੍ਵਮ੍ (equanimity of mind). The text points out that one should not cling to family, possessions, or outcomes, but instead cultivate a steady mind regardless of what life brings. The phrase ਪੁਤ੍ਰ-ਦਾਰ-ਗ੍ਰੁਰੁਇਹ-ਆਦਿਸ਼ੁ specifies that this detachment is not just from objects, but also from relationships and roles that are often deeply rooted in personal identity. The verse further emphasizes that true wisdom involves remaining even-minded when faced with both desirable and undesirable events (ਇਸ਼੍ਟ-ਅਨਿਸ਼੍ਟ-ਉਪਪਤ੍ਤਿਸ਼ੁ), suggesting that spiritual maturity is measured by how one responds to life's ups and downs rather than by external achievements or attachments.

The profound teachings of ਆਦਿ ਸ਼ਂਕਰਾਚਾਰ੍ਯ and ਸ਼੍ਰੀ ਰਾਮਾਨੁਜਾਚਾਰ੍ਯ illuminate this verse's call for non-attachment and equanimity. ਆਦਿ ਸ਼ਂਕਰਾਚਾਰ੍ਯ emphasizes that recognizing the transient nature of worldly phenomena and the inherent suffering in birth, death, and old age naturally fosters ਅਸਕ੍ਤਿਃ, detachment from sense objects and relationships. He often cites the Upanishadic prayer ਮ੍ਰੁਰੁਇਤ੍ਯੋਰ੍ਮਾ ਅਮ੍ਰੁਰੁਇਤਂ ਗਮਯ from the ਚਕ੍ਸ਼ੁਸ਼ੋਪਨਿਸ਼ਦ੍, which means 'lead me from death to immortality,' highlighting the aspirant's journey beyond the cycle of birth and death through dispassion. Meanwhile, ਸ਼੍ਰੀ ਰਾਮਾਨੁਜਾਚਾਰ੍ਯ interprets non-attachment as arising from the clear discrimination between the eternal self and the impermanent body, teaching that equanimity is rooted in the understanding that all external experiences are fleeting and do not define the true self. This insight prepares the seeker to maintain a steady mind amid life's fluctuations, thus bridging the philosophical foundation laid in the first paragraph with the practical guidance on cultivating such balance in daily life, as discussed next.

In modern life, practicing non-attachment might mean caring deeply for your family while not letting your happiness depend solely on their actions or achievements. For example, a parent might support their child's choices without feeling devastated if things do not go as hoped. Similarly, equanimity could involve responding calmly to both praise and criticism at work, rather than being elated by success or crushed by setbacks. To reflect on this, consider a recent situation where you felt strongly attached to an outcome or person. Ask yourself: How did this attachment affect your peace of mind? What might change if you approached similar situations with more even-mindedness and less possessiveness? This exercise can help reveal where greater detachment and balance could bring more stability and contentment.

ਮਯਿ ਚਾਨਨ੍ਯਯੋਗੇਨ ਭਕ੍ਤਿਰਵ੍ਯਭਿਚਾਰਿਣੀ ।
ਵਿਵਿਕ੍ਤਦੇਸ਼ਸੇਵਿਤ੍ਵਮ੍ ਅਰਤਿਰ੍ਜਨਸਂਸਦਿ ॥10॥

Meaning (ਪਦਾਰ੍ਥ):
ਮਯਿ - in Me (the Supreme, in the Lord)
ਚ - and
ਅਨਨ੍ਯ-ਯੋਗੇਨ - with undivided (exclusive) ਯੋਗ (devotion)
ਭਕ੍ਤਿਃ - devotion
ਅਵ੍ਯਭਿਚਾਰਿਣੀ - unwavering, unbroken
ਵਿਵਿਕ੍ਤ-ਦੇਸ਼-ਸੇਵਿਤ੍ਵਮ੍ - fondness for solitary places
ਅਰਤਿਹ੍ - disinterest, aversion
ਜਨ-ਸਂਸਦਿ - in crowds, in company of people

Translation (ਭਾਵਾਰ੍ਥ):
Unwavering devotion to Me through exclusive yoga, a preference for quiet and solitary places, and a lack of attraction to crowds or social gatherings.

Commentary (ਅਨੁਸਂਧਾਨ):
This verse highlights three qualities that support spiritual growth: ਅਵ੍ਯਭਿਚਾਰਿਣੀ ਭਕ੍ਤਿਃ (steady, undistracted devotion), ਵਿਵਿਕ੍ਤ-ਦੇਸ਼-ਸੇਵਿਤ੍ਵਮ੍ (seeking out solitude), and ਅਰਤਿਹ੍ ਜਨ-ਸਂਸਦਿ (disinterest in crowds). The first, unwavering devotion, means maintaining a single-pointed focus on the Divine without letting other interests or distractions dilute one's commitment. The second, seeking solitude, encourages spending time in quiet places that are conducive to reflection and meditation. The third, aversion to crowds, suggests that spiritual progress is often hindered by constant socializing or the distractions of busy environments. Together, these qualities help create an inner atmosphere where deeper understanding and connection with the Divine can flourish.

ਆਦਿ ਸ਼ਂਕਰਾਚਾਰ੍ਯ explains that ਅਵ੍ਯਭਿਚਾਰਿਣੀ ਭਕ੍ਤਿਃ signifies a devotion that remains unwavering and exclusive to the Supreme, not diverted by other objects or distractions. He further clarifies that ਵਿਵਿਕ੍ਤ-ਦੇਸ਼-ਸੇਵਿਤ੍ਵਮ੍ involves consciously choosing environments that foster mental calmness and spiritual focus, rather than mere physical solitude. Similarly, ਸ਼੍ਰੀ ਮਧ੍ਵਾਚਾਰ੍ਯ interprets these qualities as essential inner dispositions that support the cultivation of knowledge and realization, emphasizing that such steadfastness and selective seclusion are not superficial practices but deeply rooted attitudes. This understanding aligns with the Upanishadic injunction ਨ ਜਾਯਤੇ ਮ੍ਰਿਯਤੇ ਵਾ ਵਿਪਸ਼੍ਚਿਤ੍ from the ਕਠੋਪਨਿਸ਼ਦ੍ (1.2.18), which teaches that the true Self neither takes birth nor dies, encouraging the aspirant to maintain steady devotion and equanimity beyond worldly fluctuations. Together, these insights bridge the cultivation of unwavering devotion and solitude with practical steps toward spiritual progress, preparing the ground for applying these principles in daily life.

In modern life, unwavering devotion might look like setting aside time each day for meditation or prayer, regardless of how busy or distracted you feel. Seeking solitude could mean taking regular walks in nature, turning off digital devices for a while, or creating a quiet corner in your home for reflection. Disinterest in crowds might involve choosing meaningful one-on-one interactions over large, noisy gatherings, or being mindful of how much time you spend on social media. As a reflection exercise, consider: When do you feel most connected to your deeper self or purpose? What simple changes could you make to create more space for that connection in your daily routine?

ਅਧ੍ਯਾਤ੍ਮਜ੍ਞਾਨਨਿਤ੍ਯਤ੍ਵਂ ਤਤ੍ਤ੍ਵਜ੍ਞਾਨਾਰ੍ਥਦਰ੍ਸ਼ਨਮ੍ ।
ਏਤਜ੍ਜ੍ਞਾਨਮਿਤਿ ਪ੍ਰੋਕ੍ਤਮ੍ ਅਜ੍ਞਾਨਂ ਯਦਤੋ਽ਨ੍ਯਥਾ ॥11॥

Meaning (ਪਦਾਰ੍ਥ):
ਅਧ੍ਯਾਤ੍ਮ-ਜ੍ਞਾਨ-ਨਿਤ੍ਯਤ੍ਵਮ੍ - constancy in self-knowledge
ਤਤ੍ਤ੍ਵ-ਜ੍ਞਾਨ-ਅਰ੍ਥ-ਦਰ੍ਸ਼ਨਮ੍ - seeing the purpose of true knowledge
ਏਤਤ੍ - this
ਜ੍ਞਾਨਂ - knowledge
ਇਤਿ - thus
ਪ੍ਰੋਕ੍ਤਮ੍ - is said
ਅਜ੍ਞਾਨਂ - ignorance
ਯਤ੍ - that which
ਅਤਃ - other than this
ਅਨ੍ਯਥਾ - otherwise

Translation (ਭਾਵਾਰ੍ਥ):
Steadfastness in the pursuit of self-knowledge, and the understanding of the true purpose behind wisdom-these are declared to be knowledge. Anything contrary to this is considered ignorance.

Commentary (ਅਨੁਸਂਧਾਨ):
This verse highlights two essential qualities: ਅਧ੍ਯਾਤ੍ਮ-ਜ੍ਞਾਨ-ਨਿਤ੍ਯਤ੍ਵਮ੍ (constancy in self-knowledge) and ਤਤ੍ਤ੍ਵ-ਜ੍ਞਾਨ-ਅਰ੍ਥ-ਦਰ੍ਸ਼ਨਮ੍ (the ability to discern the real aim of wisdom). The first quality points to a continuous, unwavering inquiry into the nature of the self, not just an occasional or theoretical interest. The second emphasizes that knowledge is not just about collecting facts or philosophical concepts, but about perceiving their deeper purpose-understanding what is truly real and meaningful. By stating ਏਤਤ੍ ਜ੍ਞਾਨਂ ਇਤਿ ਪ੍ਰੋਕ੍ਤਮ੍, the verse asserts that these qualities together constitute genuine knowledge. Anything that deviates from this, as indicated by ਅਜ੍ਞਾਨਂ ਯਤ੍ ਅਤਃ ਅਨ੍ਯਥਾ, falls into the realm of ignorance, regardless of how intellectually impressive it may seem.

ਆਦਿ ਸ਼ਂਕਰਾਚਾਰ੍ਯ elucidates that ਅਧ੍ਯਾਤ੍ਮ-ਜ੍ਞਾਨ-ਨਿਤ੍ਯਤ੍ਵਮ੍ signifies an unwavering, continuous engagement in self-knowledge, not merely theoretical understanding, while ਤਤ੍ਤ੍ਵ-ਜ੍ਞਾਨ-ਅਰ੍ਥ-ਦਰ੍ਸ਼ਨਮ੍ reveals the insight into the ultimate purpose of knowledge-realization of the Self beyond transient phenomena. He supports this by referencing the Upanishadic prayer ਅਸਤੋ ਮਾ ਸਦ੍ਗਮਯ from the ਬ੍ਰੁਰੁਇਹਦਾਰਣ੍ਯਕ ਉਪਨਿਸ਼ਦ੍, which means 'Lead me from the unreal to the real,' emphasizing the transformative aim of true knowledge. Similarly, ਸ਼੍ਰੀ ਰਾਮਾਨੁਜਾਚਾਰ੍ਯ stresses that such knowledge must be accompanied by devotion and focused surrender to the Supreme, ensuring that the seeker's understanding is not fragmented but directed toward liberation. This integrated view connects the intellectual and devotional dimensions, highlighting that genuine wisdom involves both steady self-inquiry and a clear vision of the ultimate reality. This foundation prepares the way for practical application, as discussed in the following paragraph.

In modern life, this teaching can be applied by consistently reflecting on the deeper meaning behind our actions and learning, rather than just accumulating information or following routines. For example, a student might focus not only on memorizing facts, but on understanding how their studies contribute to their personal growth and values. A professional could regularly ask themselves whether their work aligns with their core principles and long-term purpose. As a reflection exercise, set aside a few minutes each day to ask: 'Am I pursuing knowledge that leads me closer to understanding myself and my purpose, or am I distracted by superficial goals?' This habit can help keep your efforts aligned with genuine wisdom.

ਜ੍ਞੇਯਂ ਯਤ੍ਤਤ੍ਪ੍ਰਵਕ੍ਸ਼੍ਯਾਮਿ ਯਜ੍ਜ੍ਞਾਤ੍ਵਾ਽ਮ੍ਰੁਰੁਇਤਮਸ਼੍ਨੁਤੇ ।
ਅਨਾਦਿਮਤ੍ਪਰਂ ਬ੍ਰਹ੍ਮ ਨ ਸਤ੍ਤਨ੍ਨਾਸਦੁਚ੍ਯਤੇ ॥12॥

Meaning (ਪਦਾਰ੍ਥ):
ਜ੍ਞੇਯਂ - that which is to be known
ਯਤ੍ - which
ਤਤ੍ - that
ਪ੍ਰਵਕ੍ਸ਼੍ਯਾਮਿ - I will explain
ਯਤ੍ - which
ਜ੍ਞਾਤ੍ਵਾ - having known
ਅਮ੍ਰੁਰੁਇਤਮ੍ - immortality
ਅਸ਼੍ਨੁਤੇ - attains
ਅਨਾਦਿ - without beginning
ਮਤ੍ - supreme
ਪਰਮ੍ - highest
ਬ੍ਰਹ੍ਮ - Brahman (Absolute Reality)
ਨ - not
ਸਤ੍ - existence (being)
ਨ - nor
ਅਸਤ੍ - non-existence (non-being)
ਉਚ੍ਯਤੇ - is called

Translation (ਭਾਵਾਰ੍ਥ):
I will now describe that which is to be known, by knowing which one attains immortality. It is the beginningless Supreme Brahman, which is neither called being nor non-being.

Commentary (ਅਨੁਸਂਧਾਨ):
This verse introduces the subject of the 'knowable' (ਜ੍ਞੇਯਂ), the ultimate reality that is the focus of true knowledge. The Lord says, 'I will explain' (ਪ੍ਰਵਕ੍ਸ਼੍ਯਾਮਿ) that which, when understood (ਜ੍ਞਾਤ੍ਵਾ), leads to immortality (ਅਮ੍ਰੁਰੁਇਤਮ੍). The object to be known is described as the Supreme Brahman (ਪਰਂ ਬ੍ਰਹ੍ਮ), which is without beginning (ਅਨਾਦਿ). Importantly, this Brahman cannot be categorized as either existence (ਸਤ੍) or non-existence (ਅਸਤ੍), indicating its transcendence beyond ordinary dualities. The verse sets the stage for a deeper exploration of the nature of reality, emphasizing that the highest knowledge is not about empirical objects, but about the eternal, unconditioned principle underlying all phenomena.

ਆਦਿ ਸ਼ਂਕਰਾਚਾਰ੍ਯ elucidates that the Supreme Brahman transcends all dualities, including ਸਤ੍ and ਅਸਤ੍, and that steadfast realization of this truth culminates in liberation. He emphasizes that the qualities mentioned earlier serve as preparatory steps, but the ultimate aim is the direct experiential knowledge of Brahman, which is beyond all conceptual distinctions. Similarly, ਸ਼੍ਰੀ ਰਾਮਾਨੁਜਾਚਾਰ੍ਯ interprets the verse as pointing to the personal Supreme Being, highlighting that true knowledge involves recognizing the Lord as the ultimate reality who grants immortality. This aligns with the Upanishadic invocation ਮ੍ਰੁਰੁਇਤ੍ਯੋਰ੍ਮਾ ਅਮ੍ਰੁਰੁਇਤਂ ਗਮਯ from the ਬ੍ਰੁਰੁਇਹਦਾਰਣ੍ਯਕ ਉਪਨਿਸ਼ਦ੍, meaning 'Lead me from death to immortality,' which underscores the transformative power of this knowledge. Together, these teachings bridge the understanding of Brahman's transcendence with the practical goal of spiritual liberation, preparing us to apply this insight in daily life as discussed next.

In modern life, this teaching invites us to look beyond surface appearances and labels, whether in our relationships, careers, or self-identity. For example, when facing a difficult situation, instead of seeing it as simply 'good' or 'bad', we can reflect on the underlying reality that supports all change. In science, the search for a unified theory echoes the quest for a single underlying principle. A practical exercise: take a moment to observe your thoughts and feelings without labeling them as positive or negative. Notice the awareness in which they arise and subside. This awareness, which is not limited by the dualities of existence and non-existence, points toward the kind of knowledge described in this verse.

ਸਰ੍ਵਤਃ ਪਾਣਿਪਾਦਂ ਤਤ੍ ਸਰ੍ਵਤੋ਽ਕ੍ਸ਼ਿਸ਼ਿਰੋਮੁਖਮ੍ ।
ਸਰ੍ਵਤਃ ਸ਼੍ਰੁਤਿਮਲ੍ਲੋਕੇ ਸਰ੍ਵਮਾਵ੍ਰੁਰੁਇਤ੍ਯ ਤਿਸ਼੍ਠਤਿ ॥13॥

Meaning (ਪਦਾਰ੍ਥ):
ਸਰ੍ਵਤਃ - from all sides, everywhere
ਪਾਣਿ - hand
ਪਾਦ - foot
ਤਤ੍ - that (referring to the Supreme)
ਸਰ੍ਵਤਃ - everywhere
ਅਕ੍ਸ਼ਿ - eye
ਸ਼ਿਰਹ੍ - head
ਮੁਖਮ੍ - mouth
ਸਰ੍ਵਤਃ - everywhere
ਸ਼੍ਰੁਤਿ - ear
ਅਪਿ - also
ਲੋਕੇ - in the world
ਸਰ੍ਵਮ੍ - all
ਆਵ੍ਰੁਰੁਇਤ੍ਯ - pervading, enveloping
ਤਿਸ਼੍ਠਤਿ - remains, exists

Translation (ਭਾਵਾਰ੍ਥ):
That Supreme Reality has hands and feet everywhere, eyes, heads, and mouths in all directions, and ears throughout the world. Pervading everything, it remains present in all.

Commentary (ਅਨੁਸਂਧਾਨ):
This verse uses vivid imagery with words like ਸਰ੍ਵਤਃ (everywhere), ਪਾਣਿਪਾਦਂ (hands and feet), ਅਕ੍ਸ਼ਿਸ਼ਿਰੋਮੁਖਮ੍ (eyes, heads, mouths), and ਸ਼੍ਰੁਤਿ (ears) to describe the all-pervading nature of the Supreme. The repetition of 'everywhere' emphasizes that the Divine is not limited to a particular form or location but is present in every aspect of creation. The phrase ਸਰ੍ਵਂ ਆਵ੍ਰੁਰੁਇਤ੍ਯ ਤਿਸ਼੍ਠਤਿ (pervading all, it remains) highlights the immanence of the Supreme, suggesting that nothing exists outside its presence. The verse does not imply that the Divine literally has countless physical limbs or senses, but rather that all actions, perceptions, and experiences in the universe are ultimately expressions of this underlying Reality.

ਆਦਿ ਸ਼ਂਕਰਾਚਾਰ੍ਯ explains that the verse poetically conveys Brahman's omnipresence and omniscience, portraying the Supreme as the inner witness and foundation of all sensory and motor faculties. This aligns with the Upanishadic teaching ਨ ਜਾਯਤੇ ਮ੍ਰਿਯਤੇ ਵਾ ਵਿਪਸ਼੍ਚਿਤ੍ from the ਕਠੋਪਨਿਸ਼ਦ੍ (1.2.18), which means the wise Self neither takes birth nor dies, emphasizing the eternal and pervasive nature of the Divine. Meanwhile, ਸ਼੍ਰੀ ਰਾਮਾਨੁਜਾਚਾਰ੍ਯ interprets the imagery as illustrating the Lord's intimate involvement with every living being, acting through all forms and senses, thus highlighting the inseparable connection between the individual soul and the Supreme. Together, these perspectives deepen the understanding that the Supreme's presence is not physical but an all-encompassing consciousness that sustains and animates the universe. This sets the stage for recognizing in daily life how our actions and perceptions can be seen as expressions of the Divine, as discussed in the following paragraph.

In modern life, this teaching can be seen in the interconnectedness of all people and living beings. For example, when we help someone in need, we are in a sense acting as the 'hands' of the Divine. When we listen with empathy, we become the 'ears' of the Supreme. In a globalized world, recognizing that the same consciousness pervades everyone can foster compassion and reduce prejudice. As a reflection exercise, consider a moment today when you interact with someone-try to see that interaction as the Divine meeting itself in another form. How does this shift your attitude or deepen your sense of connection?

ਸਰ੍ਵੇਂਦ੍ਰਿਯਗੁਣਾਭਾਸਂ ਸਰ੍ਵੇਂਦ੍ਰਿਯਵਿਵਰ੍ਜਿਤਮ੍ ।
ਅਸਕ੍ਤਂ ਸਰ੍ਵਭ੍ਰੁਰੁਇਚ੍ਚੈਵ ਨਿਰ੍ਗੁਣਂ ਗੁਣਭੋਕ੍ਤ੍ਰੁਰੁਇ ਚ ॥14॥

Meaning (ਪਦਾਰ੍ਥ):
ਸਰ੍ਵ-ਇਂਦ੍ਰਿਯ-ਗੁਣ-ਆਭਾਸਮ੍ - appearing as the functions of all senses
ਸਰ੍ਵ-ਇਂਦ੍ਰਿਯ-ਵਿਵਰ੍ਜਿਤਮ੍ - yet devoid of all senses
ਅਸਕ੍ਤਂ - unattached
ਸਰ੍ਵ-ਭ੍ਰੁਰੁਇਤ੍ - the sustainer of all
ਚ - and
ਏਵ - indeed
ਨਿਰ੍ਗੁਣਂ - without qualities (gunas)
ਗੁਣ-ਭੋਕ੍ਤ੍ਰੁ - experiencer of qualities
ਚ - and

Translation (ਭਾਵਾਰ੍ਥ):
That which appears as the activity of all senses, yet is itself without any senses, remains unattached, supports everything, is beyond all qualities, and yet experiences the play of qualities.

Commentary (ਅਨੁਸਂਧਾਨ):
This verse uses paradoxical expressions to describe the true nature of the Self or the Supreme Reality. The terms ਸਰ੍ਵ-ਇਂਦ੍ਰਿਯ-ਗੁਣ-ਆਭਾਸਮ੍ and ਸਰ੍ਵ-ਇਂਦ੍ਰਿਯ-ਵਿਵਰ੍ਜਿਤਮ੍ highlight that the Self seems to act through all the senses, yet is not limited by any of them. ਅਸਕ੍ਤਂ means it is unattached, not bound by any action or experience. ਸਰ੍ਵ-ਭ੍ਰੁਰੁਇਤ੍ points to its role as the sustainer of all beings, while ਨਿਰ੍ਗੁਣਂ and ਗੁਣ-ਭੋਕ੍ਤ੍ਰੁ together show that it is beyond all qualities but still witnesses and experiences their manifestations. The verse thus presents the Self as both immanent in all activities and utterly transcendent, not affected by the world it pervades.

The nuanced expressions in this verse have been elucidated by prominent Acharyas who deepen our understanding of the Self's transcendence and immanence. ਆਦਿ ਸ਼ਂਕਰਾਚਾਰ੍ਯ explains that the Self's apparent presence in all sensory activities is a result of ਅਧ੍ਯਾਸ-superimposition-where the formless, immutable Self is mistakenly identified with the changing body and senses, thus it remains untouched and beyond all qualities. In contrast, ਸ਼੍ਰੀ ਰਾਮਾਨੁਜਾਚਾਰ੍ਯ interprets the verse as affirming the Supreme's omnipresence and omnipotence, capable of performing all functions everywhere without physical organs, highlighting the Divine's all-encompassing nature that transcends material limitations. This aligns with the Upanishadic invocation ਤਮਸੋ ਮਾ ਜ੍ਯੋਤਿਰ੍ਗਮਯ ("Lead me from darkness to light"), which signifies the journey from ignorance to the illuminating knowledge of the Self that pervades all yet remains unaffected. These perspectives build on the verse's portrayal of the Self as both immanent and transcendent, preparing us to reflect on how this understanding can be applied practically in our lives.

In modern life, this teaching can be reflected in the way we perform our roles: a leader may coordinate many actions without being directly involved in each task, or a parent may support a child's growth without controlling every experience. Similarly, technology like the internet enables countless interactions but is not itself any single message or post. As a reflection exercise, consider an area of your life where you feel overly entangled-can you recognize the part of yourself that observes and supports all your actions, yet remains untouched by their outcomes? This perspective can help cultivate inner freedom and a sense of connection to a deeper, unchanging reality.

ਬਹਿਰਂਤਸ਼੍ਚ ਭੂਤਾਨਾਮ੍ ਅਚਰਂ ਚਰਮੇਵ ਚ ।
ਸੂਕ੍ਸ਼੍ਮਤ੍ਵਾਤ੍ਤਦਵਿਜ੍ਞੇਯਂ ਦੂਰਸ੍ਥਂ ਚਾਂਤਿਕੇ ਚ ਤਤ੍ ॥15॥

Meaning (ਪਦਾਰ੍ਥ):
ਬਹਿਹ੍ - outside
ਅਂਤਹ੍ - inside
ਚ - and
ਭੂਤਾਨਾਮ੍ (ਭੂਤ + ਆਨਾਮ੍) - of beings
ਅਚਰਂ - the unmoving
ਚਰਮ੍ - the moving
ਏਵ - indeed
ਚ - and
ਸੂਕ੍ਸ਼੍ਮਤ੍ਵਾਤ੍ (ਸੂਕ੍ਸ਼੍ਮ + ਤ੍ਵਾਤ੍) - due to subtlety
ਤਤ੍ - that (the Self)
ਅਵਿਜ੍ਞੇਯਮ੍ (ਅ + ਵਿਜ੍ਞੇਯਮ੍) - not knowable (not easily known)
ਦੂਰਸ੍ਥਂ (ਦੂਰ + ਸ੍ਥਮ੍) - situated far away
ਚ - and
ਅਂਤਿਕੇ - very near
ਚ - and
ਤਤ੍ - that (the Self)

Translation (ਭਾਵਾਰ੍ਥ):
That which exists both outside and inside all beings, which is both unmoving and moving, is so subtle that it cannot be easily known. It is far away yet also very close.

Commentary (ਅਨੁਸਂਧਾਨ):
This verse uses several key terms to describe the nature of the Self: ਬਹਿਹ੍ (outside), ਅਂਤਹ੍ (inside), ਅਚਰਂ (unmoving), ਚਰਮ੍ (moving), and ਸੂਕ੍ਸ਼੍ਮਤ੍ਵਾਤ੍ (due to subtlety). The Self is said to pervade all beings, existing both within and without, transcending the boundaries of physical forms. The phrase 'unmoving and moving' highlights that the Self is the underlying reality in both inert and active aspects of creation. Its subtlety is such that ordinary perception cannot grasp it; it is not an object that can be simply pointed out or measured. The paradox of being 'far away and very near' points to the Self's transcendence of spatial limitations, being present everywhere yet not easily recognized by those who are not inwardly attuned.

ਆਦਿ ਸ਼ਂਕਰਾਚਾਰ੍ਯ elucidates that the Self, though appearing to animate all beings by its presence within and without, remains itself untouched by action, beyond all sensory and instrumental faculties. This aligns with the verse's emphasis on the Self's subtlety and transcendence of physical boundaries. ਸ਼੍ਰੀ ਰਾਮਾਨੁਜਾਚਾਰ੍ਯ further clarifies that the Self is the ultimate knower who illumines the workings of the senses without being affected or limited by them, thus remaining detached yet supportive of all existence. This dual nature of being both immanent and transcendent is echoed in the Upanishadic prayer ਤਮਸੋ ਮਾ ਜ੍ਯੋਤਿਰ੍ਗਮਯ from the ਬ੍ਰੁਰੁਇਹਦਾਰਣ੍ਯਕ ਉਪਨਿਸ਼ਦ੍, which means 'Lead me from darkness to light,' symbolizing the journey from ignorance of the Self's subtle presence to the realization of its illuminating truth. This understanding prepares us to recognize the Self's presence beyond external appearances, setting the stage for the practical reflections in the following paragraph.

In modern life, this teaching can be reflected in how we often overlook the deeper presence within ourselves and others, focusing only on external actions or appearances. For example, someone may be physically close to us but emotionally distant, or a profound insight may seem elusive until we quiet our minds. Another example is how technology connects people across the globe, making distance irrelevant, yet true understanding still requires inner connection. As a reflection exercise, consider a situation where you felt disconnected from your own deeper self or from someone else. What subtle factors made that connection seem 'far away,' and what helped bring it 'closer'? This verse invites us to look beyond surface differences and recognize the subtle, ever-present reality that unites all beings.

ਅਵਿਭਕ੍ਤਂ ਚ ਭੂਤੇਸ਼ੁ ਵਿਭਕ੍ਤਮਿਵ ਚ ਸ੍ਥਿਤਮ੍ ।
ਭੂਤਭਰ੍ਤ੍ਰੁਰੁਇ ਚ ਤਜ੍ਜ੍ਞੇਯਂ ਗ੍ਰਸਿਸ਼੍ਣੁ ਪ੍ਰਭਵਿਸ਼੍ਣੁ ਚ ॥16॥

Meaning (ਪਦਾਰ੍ਥ):
ਅਵਿਭਕ੍ਤਂ - undivided
ਚ - and
ਭੁਤੇਸ਼ੁ (ਭੂਤੇਸ਼ੁ) - in all beings
ਵਿਭਕ੍ਤਂ ਇਵ - as if divided
ਚ - and
ਸ੍ਥਿਤਮ੍ - situated
ਭੁਤ-ਭਰ੍ਤ੍ਰੁਰੁਇ (ਭੂਤਭਰ੍ਤ੍ਰੁਰੁਇ) - the sustainer of beings
ਚ - and
ਤਤ੍ - that (the knowable)
ਜ੍ਨੇਯਮ੍ (ਜ੍ਞੇਯਂ) - to be known
ਗ੍ਰਸਿਸ੍ਣੁ (ਗ੍ਰਸਿਸ਼੍ਣੁ) - the devourer (absorber)
ਪ੍ਰਭਵਿਸ੍ਣੁ (ਪ੍ਰਭਵਿਸ਼੍ਣੁ) - the originator (producer)
ਚ - and

Translation (ਭਾਵਾਰ੍ਥ):
That which is to be known appears undivided in all beings, yet seems divided among them. It is present as the sustainer of all, and is both the absorber and the source of all beings.

Commentary (ਅਨੁਸਂਧਾਨ):
This verse uses key terms like ਅਵਿਭਕ੍ਤਂ (undivided), ਵਿਭਕ੍ਤਂ ਇਵ (as if divided), ਭੂਤਭਰ੍ਤ੍ਰੁਰੁਇ (sustainer of beings), ਗ੍ਰਸਿਸ਼੍ਣੁ (absorber), and ਪ੍ਰਭਵਿਸ਼੍ਣੁ (originator) to describe the mysterious nature of the ultimate reality. The verse highlights a paradox: the supreme consciousness is present everywhere and in everything, yet it is not fragmented by the diversity of forms. It appears as if it is divided because it manifests through countless beings, but in truth, it remains whole and indivisible. This consciousness not only supports all existence but also absorbs everything at dissolution and brings forth all beings at creation. The verse invites us to contemplate how the same underlying reality can seem both one and many, both the cause and the end of all things.

ਆਦਿ ਸ਼ਂਕਰਾਚਾਰ੍ਯ elucidates that the supreme self, though appearing both inside and outside all beings, remains indivisible and beyond fragmentation, much like the subtle presence that cannot be grasped by ordinary perception. He highlights that this apparent division is a result of ignorance, akin to mistaking a rope for a snake, emphasizing the self's ever-present yet misunderstood nature. ਸ਼੍ਰੀ ਰਾਮਾਨੁਜਾਚਾਰ੍ਯ complements this by explaining that the supreme exists within the body and beyond it, sustaining and governing all, yet distinct from the material elements. He notes that the divine is near to those endowed with virtuous qualities and distant from those lacking them, underscoring the relational aspect of spiritual realization. This dual immanence and transcendence resonate with the Upanishadic invocation ਮ੍ਰੁਰੁਇਤ੍ਯੋਰ੍ਮਾ ਅਮ੍ਰੁਰੁਇਤਂ ਗਮਯ from the ਬ੍ਰੁਰੁਇਹਦਾਰਣ੍ਯਕ ਉਪਨਿਸ਼ਦ੍, which prays to be led from death to immortality, symbolizing the journey from ignorance to the realization of the undivided self. Together, these insights deepen our understanding of the paradox presented in the verse and prepare us to recognize this unity in everyday life.

In daily life, this teaching can be seen when we recognize the same spark of consciousness in ourselves and others, despite differences in appearance or personality. For example, a teacher may see unique talents in each student but knows they all share the same potential for growth. Or, in a family, members may have different roles, yet the love that binds them is one and the same. Reflect for a moment: Can you recall a time when you felt connected to someone very different from you? What was the underlying sense of unity? Try to notice today how the same awareness animates everyone you meet, and consider how this perspective might change your interactions.

ਜ੍ਯੋਤਿਸ਼ਾਮਪਿ ਤਜ੍ਜ੍ਯੋਤਿਃ ਤਮਸਃ ਪਰਮੁਚ੍ਯਤੇ ।
ਜ੍ਞਾਨਂ ਜ੍ਞੇਯਂ ਜ੍ਞਾਨਗਮ੍ਯਂ ਹ੍ਰੁਰੁਇਦਿ ਸਰ੍ਵਸ੍ਯ ਵਿਸ਼੍ਠਿਤਮ੍ ॥17॥

Meaning (ਪਦਾਰ੍ਥ):
ਜ੍ਯੋਤਿਸ਼ਾਮ੍ - of all lights
ਅਪਿ - even
ਤਤ੍ - that (the Knowable, Brahman)
ਜ੍ਯੋਤਿਃ - light
ਤਮਸਃ - of darkness
ਪਰਮ੍ - beyond
ਉਚ੍ਯਤੇ - is said (to be)
ਜ੍ਞਾਨਂ - knowledge
ਜ੍ਞੇਯਂ - the object to be known
ਜ੍ਞਾਨਗਮ੍ਯਂ - attainable through knowledge
ਹ੍ਰੁਰੁਇਦਿ - in the heart
ਸਰ੍ਵਸ੍ਯ - of all (beings)
ਵਿਸ਼੍ਠਿਤਮ੍ - abiding, situated

Translation (ਭਾਵਾਰ੍ਥ):
That which is the light of all lights, said to be beyond darkness, is known as knowledge, the object to be known, and attainable through knowledge. It dwells in the heart of every being.

Commentary (ਅਨੁਸਂਧਾਨ):
This verse highlights the supreme reality as the ultimate source of illumination, using the words ਜ੍ਯੋਤਿਃ (light), ਤਮਸਃ ਪਰਮ੍ (beyond darkness), and ਹ੍ਰੁਰੁਇਦਿ ਸਰ੍ਵਸ੍ਯ ਵਿਸ਼੍ਠਿਤਮ੍ (abiding in the heart of all). Here, the 'light of all lights' refers to the consciousness that enables all perception and understanding, not just physical light. By stating that this reality is 'beyond darkness,' the verse points to its transcendence over ignorance and material limitations. The phrase 'situated in the heart of all' emphasizes its immanence, meaning that this consciousness is present within every living being, regardless of external differences. The terms ਜ੍ਞਾਨਂ, ਜ੍ਞੇਯਂ, and ਜ੍ਞਾਨਗਮ੍ਯਂ together indicate that this reality is not only the goal of knowledge but also the means and the process by which it is realized. Thus, the verse teaches that the ultimate truth is both the seeker, the seeking, and the sought, ever-present within all.

ਆਦਿ ਸ਼ਂਕਰਾਚਾਰ੍ਯ elucidates that the supreme reality, though undivided and unchanging, appears divided among beings due to ignorance, much like one light seeming to be many when reflected in multiple surfaces. He stresses that this ਜ੍ਯੋਤਿਃ is the inner illumination that dispels the darkness of ਤਮਸ੍, aligning with the Upanishadic invocation ਤਮਸੋ ਮਾ ਜ੍ਯੋਤਿਰ੍ਗਮਯ from the ਬ੍ਰੁਰੁਇਹਦਾਰਣ੍ਯਕ ਉਪਨਿਸ਼ਦ੍, which means 'Lead me from darkness to light,' symbolizing the journey from ignorance to knowledge. Meanwhile, ਸ਼੍ਰੀ ਰਾਮਾਨੁਜਾਚਾਰ੍ਯ highlights the self as the eternal supporter and sustainer of all elements within the body, distinct from the physical constituents yet intimately present, reinforcing the verse's emphasis on the supreme light abiding in the heart of all beings. These perspectives deepen the understanding that the ultimate reality is both transcendent and immanent, illuminating the path for inner realization, which naturally leads to the practical exploration of consciousness discussed next.

In modern life, this teaching can be seen in the way consciousness underlies all our experiences, whether we are aware of it or not. For example, during moments of clarity or inspiration, we might sense a lightness or insight that seems to come from within, guiding our actions beyond mere logic. Similarly, when we feel lost or overwhelmed, remembering that an inner light remains present can offer reassurance and direction. Another example is the way people from diverse backgrounds can experience empathy or understanding, hinting at a shared inner presence. As a reflection exercise, try sitting quietly and turning your attention inward, observing the awareness that witnesses your thoughts and feelings. Ask yourself: What is the source of this awareness? How does it remain constant, even as experiences change? This practice can help you connect with the 'light of all lights' described in the verse.

ਇਤਿ ਕ੍ਸ਼ੇਤ੍ਰਂ ਤਥਾ ਜ੍ਞਾਨਂ ਜ੍ਞੇਯਂ ਚੋਕ੍ਤਂ ਸਮਾਸਤਃ ।
ਮਦ੍ਭਕ੍ਤ ਏਤਦ੍ਵਿਜ੍ਞਾਯ ਮਦ੍ਭਾਵਾਯੋਪਪਦ੍ਯਤੇ ॥18॥

Meaning (ਪਦਾਰ੍ਥ):
ਇਤਿ - thus
ਕ੍ਸ਼ੇਤ੍ਰਂ - the field (body)
ਤਥਾ - likewise
ਜ੍ਞਾਨਂ - knowledge
ਜ੍ਞੇਯਂ - the knowable
ਚ - and
ਉਕ੍ਤਮ੍ - has been stated
ਸਮਾਸਤਃ - in summary
ਮਦ੍ਭਕ੍ਤਃ - my devotee
ਏਤਤ੍ - this
ਵਿਜ੍ਞਾਯ - having understood
ਮਦ੍ਭਾਵਾਯ - to my nature (state of being one with me)
ਉਪਪਦ੍ਯਤੇ - attains

Translation (ਭਾਵਾਰ੍ਥ):
Thus, the field, knowledge, and the knowable have been concisely explained. Whoever, being devoted to me, truly understands this, becomes fit to attain my own state of being.

Commentary (ਅਨੁਸਂਧਾਨ):
This verse brings together the teachings on the nature of the field (ਕ੍ਸ਼ੇਤ੍ਰਂ), knowledge (ਜ੍ਞਾਨਂ), and the knowable (ਜ੍ਞੇਯਂ). The word ਸਮਾਸਤਃ signals that what has been discussed so far is now being summarized. The phrase ਮਦ੍ਭਕ੍ਤਃ refers specifically to a devotee of Krishna, emphasizing the importance of devotion in this process. The term ਮਦ੍ਭਾਵਾਯ points to attaining the divine state or nature of Krishna himself. The verse assures that by understanding these interconnected concepts, a sincere devotee becomes eligible to reach the highest spiritual realization, which is union with the divine. This is not just theoretical knowledge, but a transformative understanding that changes the aspirant's very being.

ਆਦਿ ਸ਼ਂਕਰਾਚਾਰ੍ਯ explains that the knowledge of the ਕ੍ਸ਼ੇਤ੍ਰਂ (field), the ਜ੍ਞੇਯ (knower), and the ਜ੍ਞਾਨਂ (knowable) is not mere intellectual understanding but a profound realization residing in the heart, where the devotee attains ਮਦ੍ਭਾਵਾਯ, or unity with the Supreme Self. Similarly, ਸ਼੍ਰੀ ਮਧ੍ਵਾਚਾਰ੍ਯ emphasizes that this knowledge must be inseparably linked with devotion, as only through steadfast love and surrender can one become eligible for the Lord's grace and reach the divine state. This synthesis of knowledge and devotion is echoed in the Upanishadic prayer ਤਮਸੋ ਮਾ ਜ੍ਯੋਤਿਰ੍ਗਮਯ from the ਬ੍ਰੁਰੁਇਹਦਾਰਣ੍ਯਕ ਉਪਨਿਸ਼ਦ੍, which means "Lead me from darkness to light," symbolizing the aspirant's journey from ignorance to spiritual illumination. Thus, the verse highlights that true wisdom is not abstract but transformative, illuminating the heart and preparing the devotee for the highest realization, which the next paragraph will show how to apply in daily life.

In modern life, this teaching can be applied by striving to understand not just the mechanics of the world (the field), but also the deeper truths about consciousness and our relationship to the divine. For example, a scientist might study the body, but true wisdom comes from recognizing the presence of consciousness within. A person working in a stressful job can reflect on their deeper identity beyond roles and achievements, cultivating a sense of inner devotion and purpose. As a reflection exercise, consider what you identify with most: your body, your thoughts, or something deeper? Take a few minutes to contemplate how understanding your true self might change your approach to daily challenges and relationships.

ਪ੍ਰਕ੍ਰੁਰੁਇਤਿਂ ਪੁਰੁਸ਼ਂ ਚੈਵ ਵਿਦ੍ਧ੍ਯਨਾਦੀ ਉਭਾਵਪਿ ।
ਵਿਕਾਰਾਂਸ਼੍ਚ ਗੁਣਾਂਸ਼੍ਚੈਵ ਵਿਦ੍ਧਿ ਪ੍ਰਕ੍ਰੁਰੁਇਤਿਸਂਭਵਾਨ੍ ॥19॥

Meaning (ਪਦਾਰ੍ਥ):
ਪ੍ਰਕ੍ਰੁਰੁਇਤਿਂ - material nature, the primordial source of matter
ਪੁਰੁਸ਼ਂ - the conscious self, spirit
ਚ - and
ਏਵ - indeed, certainly
ਵਿਦ੍ਧਿ - understand, know
ਅਨਾਦੀ - beginningless, without origin
ਉਭਾਵਪਿ - both also, both of them
ਵਿਕਾਰਾਨ੍ - modifications, transformations
ਚ - and
ਗੁਣਾਨ੍ - qualities, attributes (sattva, rajas, tamas)
ਚ - and
ਏਵ - indeed
ਵਿਦ੍ਧਿ - understand, know
ਪ੍ਰਕ੍ਰੁਰੁਇਤਿ-ਸਂਭਵਾਨ੍ - arising from ਪ੍ਰਕ੍ਰੁਰੁਇਤਿ, originating in material nature

Translation (ਭਾਵਾਰ੍ਥ):
Understand that both material nature and the conscious self are without beginning. Also know that all changes and qualities arise from material nature.

Commentary (ਅਨੁਸਂਧਾਨ):
This verse highlights the fundamental distinction and relationship between ਪ੍ਰਕ੍ਰੁਰੁਇਤਿ (material nature) and ਪੁਰੁਸ਼ (the conscious self). Both are described as ਅਨਾਦੀ, meaning they have no discernible beginning. The verse also introduces ਵਿਕਾਰਾਨ੍ (modifications or transformations) and ਗੁਣਾਨ੍ (qualities such as sattva, rajas, and tamas), clarifying that these arise specifically from ਪ੍ਰਕ੍ਰੁਰੁਇਤਿ. The conscious self, while present alongside material nature, is not the source of these qualities or changes. This distinction is crucial for understanding the structure of existence as presented in the Gita: the interplay of the changeless self and ever-changing nature underlies all experience.

ਆਦਿ ਸ਼ਂਕਰਾਚਾਰ੍ਯ elucidates that both ਪ੍ਰਕ੍ਰੁਰੁਇਤਿ and ਪੁਰੁਸ਼ are beginningless realities, yet only ਪ੍ਰਕ੍ਰੁਰੁਇਤਿ is the source from which all ਵਿਕਾਰ (modifications) and ਗੁਣ (qualities) arise, while the ਪੁਰੁਸ਼ remains untainted and distinct. This distinction is vital for spiritual discernment, as emphasized by ਸ਼੍ਰੀ ਮਧ੍ਵਾਚਾਰ੍ਯ, who stresses the independence of the self from the mutable qualities of nature, affirming that the soul is untouched by the transformations occurring in ਪ੍ਰਕ੍ਰੁਰੁਇਤਿ. Supporting this understanding, the ਕਠੋਪਨਿਸ਼ਦ੍ (1.2.18) states ਨ ਜਾਯਤੇ ਮ੍ਰਿਯਤੇ ਵਾ ਵਿਪਸ਼੍ਚਿਤ੍, meaning the true self neither takes birth nor dies, highlighting its eternal and immutable nature apart from the transient material modifications. Recognizing these separate origins and natures of ਪ੍ਰਕ੍ਰੁਰੁਇਤਿ and ਪੁਰੁਸ਼ lays the foundation for detachment and self-knowledge, which prepares one to observe the fluctuations of nature without misidentification, as will be explored in the following practical reflections.

In modern life, this teaching can be seen in how we often identify ourselves with our moods, habits, or even our bodies, forgetting that these are products of material nature and not the true self. For example, when feeling anxious or restless, one might remember that these are qualities arising from ਪ੍ਰਕ੍ਰੁਰੁਇਤਿ, not from the core consciousness. Similarly, the constant changes in our environment or relationships are modifications of nature, not of the self. As a reflection exercise, try to observe your thoughts and emotions for a day, noting which are simply passing modifications and which reflect your deeper, unchanging awareness. This practice can help cultivate inner detachment and clarity about your true identity.

ਕਾਰ੍ਯਕਰਣਕਰ੍ਤ੍ਰੁਰੁਇਤ੍ਵੇ ਹੇਤੁਃ ਪ੍ਰਕ੍ਰੁਰੁਇਤਿਰੁਚ੍ਯਤੇ ।
ਪੁਰੁਸ਼ਃ ਸੁਖਦੁਃਖਾਨਾਂ ਭੋਕ੍ਤ੍ਰੁਰੁਇਤ੍ਵੇ ਹੇਤੁਰੁਚ੍ਯਤੇ ॥20॥

Meaning (ਪਦਾਰ੍ਥ):
ਕਾਰ੍ਯ - effect
ਕਰਣ - instrument
ਕਰ੍ਤ੍ਰੁਰੁਇਤ੍ਵ - agency (the state of being a doer)
ਹੇਤੁਃ - cause
ਪ੍ਰਕ੍ਰੁਰੁਇਤਿਃ - nature (primordial matter)
ਉਚ੍ਯਤੇ - is said (is called)
ਪੁਰੁਸ਼ਃ - the self (conscious being)
ਸੁਖ - pleasure
ਦੁਃਖ - pain
ਭੋਕ੍ਤ੍ਰੁਰੁਇਤ੍ਵ - experiencership (the state of being an enjoyer or sufferer)
ਹੇਤੁਃ - cause
ਉਚ੍ਯਤੇ - is said (is called)

Translation (ਭਾਵਾਰ੍ਥ):
Nature is described as the source of action, the instruments of action, and the sense of agency. The self is considered the cause of experiencing pleasure and pain.

Commentary (ਅਨੁਸਂਧਾਨ):
This verse distinguishes the roles of ਪ੍ਰਕ੍ਰੁਰੁਇਤਿ and ਪੁਰੁਸ਼ by using terms like ਕਾਰ੍ਯ (effect), ਕਰਣ (instrument), ਕਰ੍ਤ੍ਰੁਰੁਇਤ੍ਵ (agency), and ਭੋਕ੍ਤ੍ਰੁਰੁਇਤ੍ਵ (experiencership). ਫ੍ਰਕ੍ਰੁਰੁਇਤਿ is identified as the source behind all physical actions, the tools or senses used to perform them, and the very sense of being a doer. In contrast, ਪੁਰੁਸ਼ is not the doer but the conscious experiencer, the one who undergoes pleasure (ਸੁਖ) and pain (ਦੁਃਖ). This separation clarifies that while our bodies and minds are driven by nature, the awareness that experiences outcomes is distinct and untouched by action itself.

ਆਦਿ ਸ਼ਂਕਰਾਚਾਰ੍ਯ elucidates that ਪ੍ਰਕ੍ਰੁਰੁਇਤਿ alone is the source of all modifications and actions, serving as the doer and cause, while ਪੁਰੁਸ਼ remains the passive witness and experiencer, untouched by the fruits of activity. This distinction reinforces the self's non-doership, emphasizing that agency belongs solely to nature. Similarly, ਸ਼੍ਰੀ ਰਾਮਾਨੁਜਾਚਾਰ੍ਯ explains that the transformations of ਪ੍ਰਕ੍ਰੁਰੁਇਤਿ, such as desire and aversion, bind the self, yet the self itself is not the originator of these changes but merely the experiencer. This understanding is crucial because, as the ਕਠੋਪਨਿਸ਼ਦ੍ (1.2.18) states, ਨ ਜਾਯਤੇ ਮ੍ਰਿਯਤੇ ਵਾ ਵਿਪਸ਼੍ਚਿਤ੍-the true self neither takes birth nor dies nor suffers harm-highlighting its distinct, eternal nature apart from the mutable body-mind complex. Recognizing this difference between the active nature and the passive self lays the foundation for spiritual progress and prepares one to see beyond identification with transient experiences, as will be discussed in the practical implications in the next paragraph.

In daily life, this teaching can be seen when we blame ourselves for every outcome, forgetting that many factors-our bodies, minds, and circumstances-are shaped by forces beyond our conscious control. For example, when someone feels guilty for being ill or failing at a task despite sincere effort, recognizing the role of ਪ੍ਰਕ੍ਰੁਰੁਇਤਿ can bring relief. Similarly, in moments of joy or sorrow, understanding that the self is the experiencer but not the sole cause can foster detachment and peace. As a reflection, consider a recent event where you felt responsible for an outcome. Ask yourself: which part was truly under your conscious control, and which was the play of nature? This inquiry can help cultivate clarity and reduce unnecessary self-blame or pride.

ਪੁਰੁਸ਼ਃ ਪ੍ਰਕ੍ਰੁਰੁਇਤਿਸ੍ਥੋ ਹਿ ਭੁਂਕ੍ਤੇ ਪ੍ਰਕ੍ਰੁਰੁਇਤਿਜਾਨ੍ਗੁਣਾਨ੍ ।
ਕਾਰਣਂ ਗੁਣਸਂਗੋ਽ਸ੍ਯ ਸਦਸਦ੍ਯੋਨਿਜਨ੍ਮਸੁ ॥21॥

Meaning (ਪਦਾਰ੍ਥ):
ਪੁਰੁਸ਼ਃ - the individual self, conscious being
ਪ੍ਰਕ੍ਰੁਰੁਇਤਿ-ਸ੍ਥਃ - situated in nature, residing in material energy
ਹਿ - indeed, certainly
ਭੁਞ੍ਗ੍ਕ੍ਤੇ - experiences, enjoys or suffers
ਪ੍ਰਕ੍ਰੁਰੁਇਤਿ-ਜਾਨ੍ ਗੁਣਾਨ੍ - qualities born of nature (sattva, rajas, tamas)
ਕਾਰਣਂ - the cause, reason
ਗੁਣ-ਸਞ੍ਗਃ - association with the qualities (attachment to the gunas)
ਅਸ੍ਯ - of this (self)
ਸਦਸਦ੍-ਯੋਨਿ-ਜਨ੍ਮਸੁ - births in good and bad wombs (existences), in auspicious and inauspicious forms

Translation (ਭਾਵਾਰ੍ਥ):
The individual self, residing in material nature, certainly experiences the qualities that arise from nature. Attachment to these qualities is the cause for its birth in both favorable and unfavorable forms.

Commentary (ਅਨੁਸਂਧਾਨ):
This verse centers on the relationship between the conscious self (ਪੁਰੁਸ਼ਃ) and material nature (ਪ੍ਰਕ੍ਰੁਰੁਇਤਿ). The self, while residing in nature (ਪ੍ਰਕ੍ਰੁਰੁਇਤਿ-ਸ੍ਥਃ), interacts with the qualities (ਗੁਣਾਨ੍) that emerge from it. The verb ਭੁਞ੍ਗ੍ਕ੍ਤੇ highlights the self's role as the experiencer, not the creator, of pleasure and pain. The phrase ਗੁਣ-ਸਞ੍ਗਃ points to the self's association or attachment to these qualities, which becomes the root cause (ਕਾਰਣਂ) for repeated births in various forms-some auspicious (ਸਦ੍ਯੋਨਿ), some not (ਅਸਦ੍ਯੋਨਿ). The verse thus distinguishes between the passive experience of the self and the active production of circumstances by nature, emphasizing that it is the self's identification and attachment to the qualities of nature that leads to its entanglement in the cycle of birth and death.

ਆਦਿ ਸ਼ਂਕਰਾਚਾਰ੍ਯ elucidates that ਪ੍ਰਕ੍ਰੁਰੁਇਤਿ is the fundamental cause of the body and its instruments, while the ਪੁਰੁਸ਼ਃ is the experiencer of pleasure and pain, emphasizing the self's passive role in experiencing but not producing these effects. Complementing this, ਸ਼੍ਰੀ ਰਾਮਾਨੁਜਾਚਾਰ੍ਯ explains that the self, by identifying with the body and mind, becomes the locus of experience, yet all transformations and actions arise solely from ਪ੍ਰਕ੍ਰੁਰੁਇਤਿ. This distinction clarifies how the self's attachment to the qualities of nature (ਗੁਣ-ਸਞ੍ਗਃ) is the root cause of repeated births and suffering. The Upanishadic injunction ਨ ਜਾਯਤੇ ਮ੍ਰਿਯਤੇ ਵਾ ਵਿਪਸ਼੍ਚਿਤ੍ from the ਕਠੋਪਨਿਸ਼ਦ੍ (1.2.18) supports this by affirming the eternal, unchanging nature of the self, which neither takes birth nor dies, contrasting with the transient body and qualities. This understanding bridges the verse's teaching on the self's experiential role with the practical need to recognize and transcend identification with external qualities, setting the stage for the reflection on how such attachments influence our daily lives.

In modern life, this teaching can be seen when people become deeply attached to success, status, or sensory pleasures, letting these external qualities dictate their happiness and sense of self. For example, someone who constantly seeks validation through social media may find their mood rising and falling with likes and comments, illustrating attachment to external gunas. Another example is when a person blames circumstances for their unhappiness, not realizing that their own identification with those circumstances is what causes suffering. As a reflection exercise, consider a recent situation where you felt strongly affected by praise or criticism. Ask yourself: Was it the event itself, or your attachment to the outcome, that shaped your experience? This verse invites us to observe how our identification with external qualities leads to repeated patterns and to explore the freedom that comes from recognizing our true nature as the experiencer, not the doer.

ਉਪਦ੍ਰਸ਼੍ਟਾ਽ਨੁਮਂਤਾ ਚ ਭਰ੍ਤਾ ਭੋਕ੍ਤਾ ਮਹੇਸ਼੍ਵਰਃ ।
ਪਰਮਾਤ੍ਮੇਤਿ ਚਾਪ੍ਯੁਕ੍ਤਃ ਦੇਹੇ਽ਸ੍ਮਿਨ੍ਪੁਰੁਸ਼ਃ ਪਰਃ ॥22॥

Meaning (ਪਦਾਰ੍ਥ):
ਉਪਦ੍ਰਸ਼੍ਟਾ - witness
ਅਨੁਮਂਤਾ - permitter
ਚ - and
ਭਰ੍ਤਾ - sustainer
ਭੋਕ੍ਤਾ - experiencer
ਮਹੇਸ਼੍ਵਰਃ - supreme lord
ਪਰਮਾਤ੍ਮਾ - supreme self
ਇਤਿ - thus
ਚ - and
ਅਪਿ - also
ਉਕ੍ਤਃ - is called
ਦੇਹੇ - in the body
ਅਸ੍ਮਿਨ੍ - this
ਪੁਰੁਸ਼ਃ - person (spirit)
ਪਰਃ - transcendental, higher

Translation (ਭਾਵਾਰ੍ਥ):
Within this body, the supreme person is described as the witness, the one who permits, the supporter, the experiencer, the ultimate lord, and the supreme self. Though present in the body, this higher self remains distinct and beyond material nature.

Commentary (ਅਨੁਸਂਧਾਨ):
This verse highlights several key Sanskrit terms: ਉਪਦ੍ਰਸ਼੍ਟਾ (witness), ਅਨੁਮਂਤਾ (permitter), ਭਰ੍ਤਾ (sustainer), ਭੋਕ੍ਤਾ (experiencer), and ਮਹੇਸ਼੍ਵਰਃ (supreme lord). These words describe the multifaceted role of the supreme self, or ਪਰਮਾਤ੍ਮਾ, within the embodied being. The verse emphasizes that although the supreme self is present in the body, it is not entangled in the actions or experiences of the body and mind. Instead, it silently observes, allows actions to unfold, supports all functions, experiences the results, and ultimately governs the entire process. The distinction between the embodied soul and the supreme self is crucial, as it underlines the transcendence of the true self beyond the limitations of material nature.

ਆਦਿ ਸ਼ਂਕਰਾਚਾਰ੍ਯ elucidates this verse by underscoring the supreme self as the ਉਪਦ੍ਰਸ਼੍ਟਾ-the impartial witness-and ਅਨੁਮਂਤਾ-the permitter-who remains untouched by the mutable experiences of the embodied soul. He highlights that the supreme self's transcendence is essential for understanding its role as the silent observer and ultimate controller, distinct from the individual soul entangled in material nature. Similarly, ਸ਼੍ਰੀ ਮਧ੍ਵਾਚਾਰ੍ਯ emphasizes the supreme self's sovereignty as ਮਹੇਸ਼੍ਵਰਃ, the supreme enjoyer and sustainer who governs the workings of the universe without being affected by its gunas or results of actions. This distinction aligns with the Upanishadic teaching ਨ ਜਾਯਤੇ ਮ੍ਰਿਯਤੇ ਵਾ ਵਿਪਸ਼੍ਚਿਤ੍ from the ਕਠੋਪਨਿਸ਼ਦ੍ (1.2.18), meaning the true self neither takes birth nor dies, nor is it subject to decay, reinforcing the supreme self's eternal and immutable nature. These insights deepen the understanding of the supreme self's multifaceted roles introduced in the first paragraph and prepare the ground for practical application, where recognizing the inner witness can help one transcend identification with transient experiences.

In modern life, this teaching can be seen in situations where we feel overwhelmed by our thoughts or emotions. By remembering the role of the inner witness, we can observe our experiences without becoming completely absorbed in them. For example, during a heated argument, recognizing the presence of an inner observer can help us pause and respond thoughtfully rather than react impulsively. Similarly, when facing success or failure, recalling that the true self is beyond these outcomes can bring a sense of peace and detachment. As a reflection exercise, try to spend a few minutes each day simply observing your thoughts and feelings as if you were an impartial witness, noticing how this perspective shifts your sense of identity and involvement.

ਯ ਏਵਂ ਵੇਤ੍ਤਿ ਪੁਰੁਸ਼ਂ ਪ੍ਰਕ੍ਰੁਰੁਇਤਿਂ ਚ ਗੁਣੈਃ ਸਹ ।
ਸਰ੍ਵਥਾ ਵਰ੍ਤਮਾਨੋ਽ਪਿ ਨ ਸ ਭੂਯੋ਽ਭਿਜਾਯਤੇ ॥23॥

Meaning (ਪਦਾਰ੍ਥ):
ਯਃ - who
ਏਵਂ - thus/in this way
ਵੇਤ੍ਤਿ - knows
ਪੁਰੁਸ਼ਂ - the Self (spirit, conscious principle)
ਪ੍ਰਕ੍ਰੁਰੁਇਤਿਂ - material nature (primordial matter)
ਚ - and
ਗੁਣੈਃ - with the qualities (modes of nature)
ਸਹ - together/along with
ਸਰ੍ਵਥਾ - in every way/under all circumstances
ਵਰ੍ਤਮਾਨਃ - existing/acting (present participle)
ਅਪਿ - even though
ਨ - not
ਸਃ - he
ਭੂਯਃ - again
ਅਭਿਜਾਯਤੇ - is born (takes birth)

Translation (ਭਾਵਾਰ੍ਥ):
Whoever truly understands both the conscious Self and material nature, along with its qualities, and recognizes their relationship, such a person, even while living and acting in every possible way, is not born again.

Commentary (ਅਨੁਸਂਧਾਨ):
This verse centers around the terms ਪੁਰੁਸ਼ਂ (the conscious Self), ਪ੍ਰਕ੍ਰੁਰੁਇਤਿਂ (material nature), and ਗੁਣੈਃ (the modes or qualities of nature). The teaching is that one who realizes the distinction and interplay between the Self and nature, and understands how the Self remains distinct from the changing qualities of nature, attains freedom from rebirth. The phrase ਸਰ੍ਵਥਾ ਵਰ੍ਤਮਾਨਃ ਅਪਿ emphasizes that even while performing all kinds of actions or living in any circumstance, this knowledge protects one from the cycle of birth. The key is not withdrawal from life, but clear understanding and inner detachment. The verse assures that true knowledge, not mere external renunciation, is what liberates.

ਆਦਿ ਸ਼ਂਕਰਾਚਾਰ੍ਯ elucidates that the ਪੁਰੁਸ਼ is the immutable witness, distinct and uninvolved in the activities of the body and mind, which are governed by ਪ੍ਰਕ੍ਰੁਰੁਇਤਿ and its ਗੁਣs. This witnessing nature of the Self, free from all modifications, is the foundation of liberation. Complementing this, ਸ਼੍ਰੀ ਮਧ੍ਵਾਚਾਰ੍ਯ stresses the necessity of discriminative knowledge that clearly distinguishes the eternal Self from the transient material nature, asserting that such discernment alone leads to freedom from rebirth. This understanding aligns with the Upanishadic injunction ਨ ਜਾਯਤੇ ਮ੍ਰਿਯਤੇ ਵਾ ਵਿਪਸ਼੍ਚਿਤ੍ from the ਕਠੋਪਨਿਸ਼ਦ੍ (1.2.18), meaning the wise Self neither takes birth nor dies, emphasizing its transcendence beyond the cycles of nature. Together, these teachings deepen the insight introduced in the first paragraph about the Self's distinctness and prepare the ground for practical application of this knowledge in daily life, as discussed next.

In modern life, this teaching can be applied by recognizing that our core identity is not defined by our changing moods, roles, or circumstances. For example, a person facing career setbacks can remember that their true Self is untouched by external success or failure. Someone dealing with family conflicts can observe their reactions as passing qualities of nature, rather than as their essential being. A reflection exercise: Take a few minutes daily to notice your thoughts and feelings as passing events, and ask yourself, 'Who is aware of these experiences?' This practice helps cultivate the inner detachment and clarity described in the verse, gradually freeing one from being bound by life's ups and downs.

ਧ੍ਯਾਨੇਨਾਤ੍ਮਨਿ ਪਸ਼੍ਯਂਤਿ ਕੇਚਿਦਾਤ੍ਮਾਨਮਾਤ੍ਮਨਾ ।
ਅਨ੍ਯੇ ਸਾਂਖ੍ਯੇਨ ਯੋਗੇਨ ਕਰ੍ਮਯੋਗੇਨ ਚਾਪਰੇ ॥24॥

Meaning (ਪਦਾਰ੍ਥ):
ਧ੍ਯਾਨੇਨ - by meditation
ਆਤ੍ਮਨਿ - in the self
ਪਸ਼੍ਯਂਤਿ - perceive (they see)
ਕੇਚਿਤ੍ - some people
ਆਤ੍ਮਾਨਮ੍ - the self
ਆਤ੍ਮਨਾ - by the self (with the mind or intellect)
ਅਨ੍ਯੇ - others
ਸਾਂਖ੍ਯੇਨ - by Sankhya (discriminative knowledge)
ਯੋਗੇਨ - by ਯੋਗ (disciplined practice)
ਕਰ੍ਮ-ਯੋਗੇਨ - by ਕਰ੍ਮ ਯੋਗ (selfless action)
ਚ - and
ਅਪਰੇ - yet others

Translation (ਭਾਵਾਰ੍ਥ):
Some people realize the self within themselves through meditation. Others come to this understanding by following the path of knowledge, some through disciplined practice, and still others by selfless action.

Commentary (ਅਨੁਸਂਧਾਨ):
This verse highlights the diversity of spiritual approaches by referencing key terms such as ਧ੍ਯਾਨੇਨ (meditation), ਸਾਂਖ੍ਯੇਨ (the path of analysis or knowledge), ਯੋਗੇਨ (disciplined practice), and ਕਰ੍ਮ-ਯੋਗੇਨ (selfless action). The word ਪਸ਼੍ਯਂਤਿ (perceive or realize) is central, indicating that the ultimate goal-realization of the self-can be attained through different means. The phrase ਆਤ੍ਮਨਿ ਆਤ੍ਮਨਂ ਆਤ੍ਮਨ poetically suggests the self is both the seeker and the sought, emphasizing introspection and self-awareness. This verse reassures seekers that there is not just one rigid path to self-realization; rather, individuals can approach the truth in ways that resonate with their nature and disposition.

ਆਦਿ ਸ਼ਂਕਰਾਚਾਰ੍ਯ elucidates that while various paths like ਧ੍ਯਾਨ, ਸਾਂਖ੍ਯ, ਯੋਗ, and ਕਰ੍ਮ-ਯੋਗ are valid, it is ultimately the discriminative knowledge that liberates the seeker. He highlights meditation and selfless action as essential preparatory means that purify the mind for true insight. Similarly, ਸ਼੍ਰੀ ਰਾਮਾਨੁਜਾਚਾਰ੍ਯ stresses that liberation is accessible to all sincere practitioners, regardless of their chosen path, as long as their actions are performed with the understanding of the self's divine nature. This inclusive view is supported by the Upanishadic injunction ਨ ਜਾਯਤੇ ਮ੍ਰਿਯਤੇ ਵਾ ਵਿਪਸ਼੍ਚਿਤ੍ from the ਕਠੋਪਨਿਸ਼ਦ੍ (1.2.18), meaning the wise soul neither takes birth nor dies, underscoring the eternal reality that transcends all paths and states of being. This verse thus affirms the legitimacy of diverse spiritual disciplines, each suited to different temperaments, all leading to the vision of the self and setting the stage for practical application in daily life.

In modern life, this teaching encourages us to honor our individual inclinations. For example, someone who finds peace in meditation can pursue mindfulness practices, while another who thrives on intellectual inquiry might study philosophy or science deeply. A third person may find fulfillment in serving others selflessly, embodying ਕਰ੍ਮ ਯੋਗ in their daily work or volunteering. Reflect for a moment: which approach feels most natural to you right now-quiet contemplation, thoughtful analysis, or active service? Consider how you might integrate elements of the others to support your own journey toward self-understanding.

ਅਨ੍ਯੇ ਤ੍ਵੇਵਮਜਾਨਂਤਃ ਸ਼੍ਰੁਤ੍ਵਾ਽ਨ੍ਯੇਭ੍ਯ ਉਪਾਸਤੇ ।
ਤੇ਽ਪਿ ਚਾਤਿਤਰਂਤ੍ਯੇਵ ਮ੍ਰੁਰੁਇਤ੍ਯੁਂ ਸ਼੍ਰੁਤਿਪਰਾਯਣਾਃ ॥25॥

Meaning (ਪਦਾਰ੍ਥ):
ਅਨ੍ਯੇ - others
ਤੁ - but
ਏਵਂ - thus (in this way)
ਅਜਾਨਂਤਃ - those who do not know (ignorant of the true nature)
ਸ਼੍ਰੁਤ੍ਵਾ - having heard
ਅਨ੍ਯੇ - others
ਏਭ੍ਯਃ - from others
ਉਪਾਸਤੇ - engage in practice (worship, contemplation)
ਤੇ - they
ਅਪਿ - also
ਚ - and
ਅਤਿਤਰਂਤਿ - cross over (surpass, transcend)
ਏਵ - indeed
ਮ੍ਰੁਰੁਇਤ੍ਯੁਂ - death (the cycle of birth and death)
ਸ਼੍ਰੁਤਿ-ਪਰਾਯਣਾਃ - devoted to what they have heard (dedicated to scriptural teachings)

Translation (ਭਾਵਾਰ੍ਥ):
Others, even without direct knowledge, hear from those who know and follow what they have learned with dedication. By sincerely practicing what the scriptures teach, they too cross beyond death and the cycle of rebirth.

Commentary (ਅਨੁਸਂਧਾਨ):
This verse highlights the diversity of spiritual approaches by referencing key terms like ਅਨ੍ਯੇ (others), ਅਜਾਨਂਤਃ (those who do not know), ਸ਼੍ਰੁਤ੍ਵਾ (having heard), and ਸ਼੍ਰੁਤਿ-ਪਰਾਯਣਾਃ (devoted to scriptural teachings). Here, Krishna acknowledges that not everyone attains realization through direct knowledge or personal experience. Some individuals, lacking deep understanding (ਅਜਾਨਂਤਃ), instead listen to teachings from others (ਸ਼੍ਰੁਤ੍ਵਾ), and by faithfully adhering to these instructions, they engage in spiritual practice (ਉਪਾਸਤੇ). Their commitment to the guidance of sacred texts and teachers (ਸ਼੍ਰੁਤਿ-ਪਰਾਯਣਾਃ) enables them to transcend the limitations of mortality (ਅਤਿਤਰਂਤਿ ਮ੍ਰੁਰੁਇਤ੍ਯੁਂ). This affirms that sincere effort and trust in authentic teachings can also lead to liberation, even if one does not possess profound philosophical insight.

The teachings of ਆਦਿ ਸ਼ਂਕਰਾਚਾਰ੍ਯ and ਸ਼੍ਰੀ ਰਾਮਾਨੁਜਾਚਾਰ੍ਯ deepen our understanding of this verse by highlighting the inclusive nature of spiritual progress. ਆਦਿ ਸ਼ਂਕਰਾਚਾਰ੍ਯ explains that liberation is accessible not only through direct meditation or intellectual insight but also through sincere devotion to scriptural instructions, emphasizing that even those who listen and follow faithfully can transcend mortality. ਸ਼੍ਰੀ ਰਾਮਾਨੁਜਾਚਾਰ੍ਯ stresses the importance of humility and receptivity, noting that individuals who may lack the qualifications for advanced yogic practices still advance by embracing the teachings they have heard from reliable sources with devotion. This aligns with the Upanishadic invocation ਮ੍ਰੁਰੁਇਤ੍ਯੋਰ੍ਮਾ ਅਮ੍ਰੁਰੁਇਤਂ ਗਮਯ from the ਬ੍ਰੁਰੁਇਹਦਾਰਣ੍ਯਕ ਉਪਨਿਸ਼ਦ੍, which beseeches the divine to lead one from death to immortality, symbolizing the transformative power of guidance and faith. Together, these perspectives affirm that the grace of the tradition and the earnestness of the seeker are vital, bridging the verse's recognition of diverse spiritual paths with practical application in daily life.

In modern life, this teaching is especially relevant for those who may feel overwhelmed by complex philosophies or advanced meditation techniques. For example, someone who regularly attends spiritual talks or reads sacred texts, even without fully grasping every concept, can still make progress by sincerely applying what they understand. Another example is a person who follows ethical guidelines or rituals passed down through family or community, trusting in their transformative power. A reflection exercise: Consider an area of your life where you rely on trusted guidance rather than personal expertise. How does your faith in that guidance affect your growth? This verse encourages us to honor the value of sincere practice and the wisdom of tradition, reminding us that dedication and humility can open the door to profound transformation.

ਯਾਵਤ੍ਸਂਜਾਯਤੇ ਕਿਂਚਿਤ੍ ਸਤ੍ਤ੍ਵਂ ਸ੍ਥਾਵਰਜਂਗਮਮ੍ ।
ਕ੍ਸ਼ੇਤ੍ਰਕ੍ਸ਼ੇਤ੍ਰਜ੍ਞਸਂਯੋਗਾਤ੍ ਤਦ੍ਵਿਦ੍ਧਿ ਭਰਤਰ੍ਸ਼ਭ ॥26॥

Meaning (ਪਦਾਰ੍ਥ):
ਯਾਵਤ੍ - as much as, as far as
ਸਞਾਯਤੇ - is born, arises
ਕਿਂਚਿਤ੍ - anything, whatever
ਸਤ੍ਤ੍ਵਂ - being, entity
ਸ੍ਥਾਵਰ - immobile, stationary
ਜਂਗਮ - mobile, moving
ਕ੍ਸ਼ੇਤ੍ਰ - field, body
ਕ੍ਸ਼ੇਤ੍ਰਜ੍ਞ - knower of the field, conscious principle
ਸਂਯੋਗਾਤ੍ - from the union, due to the combination
ਤਦ੍ - that
ਵਿਦ੍ਧਿ - know, understand
ਭਰਤਰ੍ਸ਼ਭ - O best of the Bharatas (Arjuna)

Translation (ਭਾਵਾਰ੍ਥ):
O Arjuna, know that every living or non-living being that comes into existence, no matter how small, is born from the union of the field and the knower of the field.

Commentary (ਅਨੁਸਂਧਾਨ):
This verse highlights the universal process of creation by focusing on the terms ਕ੍ਸ਼ੇਤ੍ਰ (the field), ਕ੍ਸ਼ੇਤ੍ਰਜ੍ਞ (the knower of the field), ਸਂਯੋਗਾਤ੍ (from their union), and ਸਤ੍ਤ੍ਵਂ (entity or being). The verse asserts that all beings, whether ਸ੍ਥਾਵਰ (immobile, like plants or rocks) or ਜਂਗਮ (mobile, like animals or humans), arise from the combination of matter and consciousness. This union is not limited to only sentient beings but extends to all forms of existence, emphasizing that consciousness pervades and enlivens every aspect of the universe. The use of ਕਿਂਚਿਤ੍ (anything whatsoever) underscores the inclusivity of this principle, leaving nothing outside its scope.

The profound insight of this verse is further illuminated by the interpretations of ਆਦਿ ਸ਼ਂਕਰਾਚਾਰ੍ਯ and ਸ਼੍ਰੀ ਮਧ੍ਵਾਚਾਰ੍ਯ. ਆਦਿ ਸ਼ਂਕਰਾਚਾਰ੍ਯ teaches that the apparent duality between ਕ੍ਸ਼ੇਤ੍ਰ (the field) and ਕ੍ਸ਼ੇਤ੍ਰਜ੍ਞ (the knower of the field) dissolves upon true knowledge, revealing the non-dual reality where consciousness and matter are inseparable aspects of the same ultimate truth. In contrast, ਸ਼੍ਰੀ ਮਧ੍ਵਾਚਾਰ੍ਯ emphasizes the real distinction between the individual soul and the body, asserting that their conjunction is the foundation of all empirical experience, yet the soul remains eternally distinct and independent. This dynamic interplay between unity and difference is echoed in the Upanishadic prayer ਮ੍ਰੁਰੁਇਤ੍ਯੋਰ੍ਮਾ ਅਮ੍ਰੁਰੁਇਤਂ ਗਮਯ from the ਬ੍ਰੁਰੁਇਹਦਾਰਣ੍ਯਕ ਉਪਨਿਸ਼ਦ੍, which means 'Lead me from death to immortality,' symbolizing the journey from the transient physical existence to the eternal consciousness. Recognizing this union of the physical and the conscious, as described in the first paragraph, is essential for spiritual progress and prepares one to see how this understanding applies in everyday life, as explored in the following paragraph.

In modern life, this teaching can be seen in the way every living thing, from a tree to a human, is animated by both physical components and an animating consciousness. For example, a computer is just hardware until it is powered by electricity, just as the body is inert without consciousness. Similarly, in relationships, the connection between two people is not just physical presence but the awareness and understanding they bring to each other. As a reflection exercise, consider observing a plant or animal and contemplating how its existence depends on both its physical form and the subtle presence of life or awareness. How does recognizing this union in all things influence your sense of connection to the world around you?

ਸਮਂ ਸਰ੍ਵੇਸ਼ੁ ਭੂਤੇਸ਼ੁ ਤਿਸ਼੍ਠਂਤਂ ਪਰਮੇਸ਼੍ਵਰਮ੍ ।
ਵਿਨਸ਼੍ਯਤ੍ਸ੍ਵਵਿਨਸ਼੍ਯਂਤਂ ਯਃ ਪਸ਼੍ਯਤਿ ਸ ਪਸ਼੍ਯਤਿ ॥27॥

Meaning (ਪਦਾਰ੍ਥ):
ਸਮਂ - equally
ਸਰ੍ਵੇਸ਼ੁ - in all
ਭੂਤੇਸ਼ੁ - beings
ਤਿਸ਼੍ਠਂਤਂ - abiding, present
ਪਰਮ ਈਸ਼੍ਵਰਮ੍ - the Supreme Lord
ਵਿਨਸ਼੍ਯਤ੍ਸੁ - in those that are perishing
ਅਵਿਨਸ਼੍ਯਂਤਮ੍ - the imperishable
ਯਃ - who
ਪਸ਼੍ਯਤਿ - sees
ਸਃ - he
ਪਸ਼੍ਯਤਿ - truly sees

Translation (ਭਾਵਾਰ੍ਥ):
Whoever perceives the Supreme Lord abiding equally in all beings, remaining unchanged even as they perish, truly sees reality.

Commentary (ਅਨੁਸਂਧਾਨ):
This verse centers on the words ਸਮਂ (equally), ਤਿਸ਼੍ਠਂਤਂ (abiding), ਪਰਮੇਸ਼੍ਵਰਮ੍ (Supreme Lord), and ਅਵਿਨਸ਼੍ਯਂਤਮ੍ (imperishable). The teaching is that the Supreme Lord exists equally within all forms of life, regardless of their differences or the fact that their bodies are subject to destruction (ਵਿਨਸ਼੍ਯਤ੍ਸੁ). The Lord remains unchanged and undiminished even as individual beings are born and die. The one who recognizes this unchanging presence within the changing world is said to have true vision. This insight shifts the focus from the outer, perishable forms to the inner, eternal reality that is the same in all.

The profound insight of this verse is further illuminated by ਆਦਿ ਸ਼ਂਕਰਾਚਾਰ੍ਯ, who explains that the Supreme Lord's presence in all beings is not a physical blending but a superimposition born of ignorance, where the Lord remains the unchanging witness beyond the mutable body and mind. Complementing this, ਸ਼੍ਰੀ ਰਾਮਾਨੁਜਾਚਾਰ੍ਯ teaches that the soul and the Supreme are inseparably united, with all beings sustained through this divine relationship, emphasizing the Lord's active role as the source and support of existence. This understanding aligns with the Upanishadic truth expressed in ਕਠੋਪਨਿਸ਼ਦ੍ (1.2.18): ਨ ਜਾਯਤੇ ਮ੍ਰਿਯਤੇ ਵਾ ਵਿਪਸ਼੍ਚਿਤ੍, meaning the wise soul neither is born nor dies, highlighting the imperishable nature of the self that the Lord indwells. Recognizing this eternal presence within the transient forms, as introduced in the first paragraph, prepares one to embody this vision practically, as discussed in the following paragraph.

In modern life, this teaching can be applied by recognizing the same divine essence in all people, regardless of their background, status, or beliefs. For example, a manager can treat every employee with equal respect, seeing beyond their roles to the shared humanity within. In times of loss or change, remembering that the true self is untouched by external events can bring stability and peace. As a reflection exercise, consider a situation where you felt disconnected from someone due to differences. Pause and try to see the unchanging presence within them, just as it exists within you. How does this perspective shift your response or attitude?

ਸਮਂ ਪਸ਼੍ਯਨ੍ਹਿ ਸਰ੍ਵਤ੍ਰ ਸਮਵਸ੍ਥਿਤਮੀਸ਼੍ਵਰਮ੍ ।
ਨ ਹਿਨਸ੍ਤ੍ਯਾਤ੍ਮਨਾ਽਽ਤ੍ਮਾਨਂ ਤਤੋ ਯਾਤਿ ਪਰਾਂ ਗਤਿਮ੍ ॥28॥

Meaning (ਪਦਾਰ੍ਥ):
ਸਮਂ - equally
ਪਸ਼੍ਯਨ੍ - seeing (one who sees)
ਹਿ - indeed
ਸਰ੍ਵਤ੍ਰ - everywhere
ਸਮਵਸ੍ਥਿਤਮ੍ - abiding equally, present in the same way
ਈਸ਼੍ਵਰਮ੍ - the Lord, supreme being
ਨ - does not
ਹਿਨਸ੍ਤਿ - harm, destroy
ਆਤ੍ਮਨਾ - by oneself
ਆਤ੍ਮਾਨਮ੍ - oneself (the self)
ਤਤਃ - then, thereafter
ਯਾਤਿ - attains, goes
ਪਰਾਂ - supreme, highest
ਗਤਿਮ੍ - state, goal

Translation (ਭਾਵਾਰ੍ਥ):
Whoever truly sees that the Supreme Lord is equally present in all beings and remains unchanged even as bodies perish, such a person does not harm themselves by their own actions and ultimately reaches the highest state.

Commentary (ਅਨੁਸਂਧਾਨ):
This verse centers on the words ਸਮਂ (equally), ਸਮਵਸ੍ਥਿਤਮ੍ (abiding equally), ਈਸ਼੍ਵਰਮ੍ (the Lord), and ਪਰਾਂ ਗਤਿਮ੍ (supreme goal). The teaching is that the one who perceives the Supreme Lord as present in the same way within every living being, regardless of external differences, is the true seer. The Lord is described as imperishable, unchanging even as the bodies-subject to birth and death-come and go. Such vision leads to a state where one does not harm oneself, either through ignorance or by causing harm to others, since harming others is ultimately harming oneself. This recognition of the Lord's presence everywhere forms the basis for compassion and nonviolence, and it is this realization that leads to the supreme goal of liberation.

ਆਦਿ ਸ਼ਂਕਰਾਚਾਰ੍ਯ elucidates that the true seer perceives the ਈਸ਼੍ਵਰਮ੍ as the unchanging, imperishable reality present equally within all perishable beings, thus affirming the absolute distinction between the transient bodies and the eternal Lord. This vision transcends mere intellectual understanding and becomes a direct realization that transforms perception. Similarly, ਸ਼੍ਰੀ ਰਾਮਾਨੁਜਾਚਾਰ੍ਯ emphasizes that recognizing the ਆਤ੍ਮਨ੍ as the supreme ruler abiding in every body-distinct from the mutable forms-is essential for liberation, as it leads one beyond identification with the ephemeral. Supporting this, the ਕਠੋਪਨਿਸ਼ਦ੍ (1.2.18) states ਨ ਜਾਯਤੇ ਮ੍ਰਿਯਤੇ ਵਾ ਵਿਪਸ਼੍ਚਿਤ੍, meaning the Self is neither born nor dies, highlighting the imperishability of the true Self within all beings. This profound insight, carried forward from the verse's teaching of equal vision of the Lord, lays the foundation for compassionate and non-harming conduct, which is further explored in the following paragraph's practical applications.

In modern life, this teaching can be applied by treating everyone with equal respect, regardless of their background or status, recognizing the same divine presence in all. For example, a manager who sees their employees as equals in essence, or a student who avoids bullying because they see others as sharing the same inner self, are both embodying this wisdom. Another example is choosing not to exploit or harm others for personal gain, understanding that such actions ultimately harm oneself. As a reflection exercise, consider a recent interaction where you felt superior or inferior to someone-pause and imagine seeing the same unchanging presence within both of you. How might this shift your attitude or behavior?

ਪ੍ਰਕ੍ਰੁਰੁਇਤ੍ਯੈਵ ਚ ਕਰ੍ਮਾਣਿ ਕ੍ਰਿਯਮਾਣਾਨਿ ਸਰ੍ਵਸ਼ਃ ।
ਯਃ ਪਸ਼੍ਯਤਿ ਤਥਾ਽਽ਤ੍ਮਾਨਮ੍ ਅਕਰ੍ਤਾਰਂ ਸ ਪਸ਼੍ਯਤਿ ॥29॥

Meaning (ਪਦਾਰ੍ਥ):
ਪ੍ਰਕ੍ਰੁਰੁਇਤ੍ਯ - by nature
ਏਵ - indeed, only
ਚ - and
ਕਰ੍ਮਾਣਿ - actions (plural of ਕਰ੍ਮ)
ਕ੍ਰਿਯਮਾਣਾਨਿ - being performed
ਸਰ੍ਵਸ਼ਃ - in every way, entirely
ਯਃ - whoever
ਪਸ਼੍ਯਤਿ - sees, perceives
ਤਥਾ - thus, in that way
ਆਤ੍ਮਾਨਮ੍ - the self (accusative singular of ਆਤ੍ਮਨ੍)
ਅਕਰ੍ਤਾਰਂ - as non-agent, not the doer
ਸ - he
ਪਸ਼੍ਯਤਿ - truly sees (repeated for emphasis)

Translation (ਭਾਵਾਰ੍ਥ):
Whoever perceives that all actions are carried out entirely by nature, and recognizes the self as not the true agent, truly sees things as they are.

Commentary (ਅਨੁਸਂਧਾਨ):
This verse highlights the distinction between the self and action by focusing on the terms ਪ੍ਰਕ੍ਰੁਰੁਇਤ੍ਯ (by nature), ਕਰ੍ਮਾਣਿ (actions), ਆਤ੍ਮਾਨਮ੍ (the self), and ਅਕਰ੍ਤਾਰਂ (non-agent). The teaching is that all actions in the world are performed by the forces of nature, not by the true self. The one who understands this does not identify the self with the body or mind, nor does he claim ownership or agency over actions. Instead, he sees the self as a witness, untouched by the workings of nature. This vision leads to a profound detachment and clarity, freeing one from the sense of doership and the resulting bondage of ਕਰ੍ਮ.

ਆਦਿ ਸ਼ਂਕਰਾਚਾਰ੍ਯ elucidates that the root cause of suffering is ignorance, which leads individuals to falsely identify the ਆਤ੍ਮਾਨਮ੍ with the body and mind, thereby assuming the role of doer of ਕਰ੍ਮਾਣਿ. He stresses that true wisdom arises from discerning the self as distinct and untouched by the actions performed by ਪ੍ਰਕ੍ਰੁਰੁਇਤਿ. Similarly, ਸ਼੍ਰੀ ਮਧ੍ਵਾਚਾਰ੍ਯ highlights that recognizing the self as ਅਕਰ੍ਤਾਰ-the non-agent-frees one from the cycle of birth and death, since the self remains uninvolved in the mutable activities of nature. This understanding aligns with the Upanishadic injunction ਨ ਜਾਯਤੇ ਮ੍ਰਿਯਤੇ ਵਾ ਵਿਪਸ਼੍ਚਿਤ੍ from the ਕਠੋਪਨਿਸ਼ਦ੍ (1.2.18), meaning the wise self neither takes birth nor dies, emphasizing its eternal and actionless nature. Together, these teachings deepen the insight introduced in the first paragraph, preparing the seeker to apply this vision practically, as discussed next.

In modern life, this teaching can help us avoid unnecessary guilt or pride over outcomes, recognizing that many factors beyond our control shape events. For example, a manager might realize that team results depend on collective effort and circumstances, not just personal leadership. A student can understand that while effort is important, results are influenced by many external factors. Reflect on a recent situation where you felt personally responsible for an outcome. Ask yourself: were all the causes really under your control, or was there a larger process at work? This reflection can foster humility and reduce anxiety, helping you act with greater wisdom and detachment.

ਯਦਾ ਭੂਤਪ੍ਰੁਰੁਇਥਗ੍ਭਾਵਮ੍ ਏਕਸ੍ਥਮਨੁਪਸ਼੍ਯਤਿ ।
ਤਤ ਏਵ ਚ ਵਿਸ੍ਤਾਰਂ ਬ੍ਰਹ੍ਮ ਸਂਪਦ੍ਯਤੇ ਤਦਾ ॥30॥

Meaning (ਪਦਾਰ੍ਥ):
ਯਦਾ - when
ਭੂਤ - beings
ਪ੍ਰੁਰੁਇਥਕ੍-ਭਾਵਮ੍ - distinct existences (separate natures)
ਏਕ-ਸ੍ਥਮ੍ - situated in the One
ਅਨੁਪਸ਼੍ਯਤਿ - perceives, observes
ਤਤਃ ਏਵ - from that alone
ਚ - and
ਵਿਸ੍ਤਾਰਂ - expansion, manifestation
ਬ੍ਰਹ੍ਮ - the Absolute, Brahman
ਸਂਪਦ੍ਯਤੇ - attains, reaches
ਤਦਾ - then

Translation (ਭਾਵਾਰ੍ਥ):
When a person perceives that the separate existences of all beings are rooted in the One and that their expansion comes from that same source, then they truly attain the Absolute.

Commentary (ਅਨੁਸਂਧਾਨ):
This verse centers on the insight that all apparent differences among beings (ਭੂਤ, ਪ੍ਰੁਰੁਇਥਕ੍-ਭਾਵਮ੍) are ultimately grounded in a single underlying reality (ਏਕ-ਸ੍ਥਮ੍). The wise person recognizes that the diversity of forms and experiences is only a surface phenomenon, while the essence of all is one. The word ਅਨੁਪਸ਼੍ਯਤਿ emphasizes a deep, sustained vision, not just intellectual understanding. The verse concludes with ਬ੍ਰਹ੍ਮ ਸਂਪਦ੍ਯਤੇ, indicating that such realization leads one to union with the Absolute. The process described is not merely theoretical; it is a transformative perception that dissolves the illusion of separateness and brings about spiritual fulfillment.

The insight of this verse is further illuminated by ਆਦਿ ਸ਼ਂਕਰਾਚਾਰ੍ਯ, who emphasizes the distinction between the mutable realm of ਪ੍ਰਕ੍ਰੁਰੁਇਤਿ and the immutable Self, asserting that true wisdom lies in perceiving all actions as performed solely by Nature, while the Self remains the non-doer. Similarly, ਸ਼੍ਰੀ ਮਧ੍ਵਾਚਾਰ੍ਯ highlights that recognizing the expansion of all beings from the singular source and understanding the Self as devoid of agency is essential for spiritual liberation. This vision dissolves the illusion of separateness and ignorance, aligning with the Upanishadic injunction ਨ ਜਾਯਤੇ ਮ੍ਰਿਯਤੇ ਵਾ ਵਿਪਸ਼੍ਚਿਤ੍ from the ਕਠੋਪਨਿਸ਼ਦ੍ (1.2.18), which teaches that the true Self neither takes birth nor dies, underscoring its eternal and unchanging nature. Together, these perspectives deepen the understanding introduced in the first paragraph and prepare us to apply this realization practically in our daily encounters, as discussed next.

In modern life, this teaching can be applied when we encounter diversity-whether in cultures, opinions, or personalities-and remember that beneath all differences lies a common essence. For example, in a workplace with people from various backgrounds, recognizing the shared humanity can foster harmony. When facing conflict, recalling that all are expressions of the same source can reduce anger and promote understanding. As a reflection exercise, try to observe a group of people today and consciously remind yourself that their apparent differences are like waves on the same ocean. Notice how this perspective shifts your attitude and interactions.

ਅਨਾਦਿਤ੍ਵਾਨ੍ਨਿਰ੍ਗੁਣਤ੍ਵਾਤ੍ ਪਰਮਾਤ੍ਮਾਯਮਵ੍ਯਯਃ ।
ਸ਼ਰੀਰਸ੍ਥੋ਽ਪਿ ਕੌਂਤੇਯ ਨ ਕਰੋਤਿ ਨ ਲਿਪ੍ਯਤੇ ॥31॥

Meaning (ਪਦਾਰ੍ਥ):
ਅਨਾਦਿਤ੍ਵਾਤ੍ - due to being without beginning
ਨਿਰ੍ਗੁਣਤ੍ਵਾਤ੍ - due to being without qualities
ਪਰਮਾਤ੍ਮਾ - the supreme Self
ਅਯਮ੍ - this (He)
ਅਵ੍ਯਯਃ - imperishable
ਸ਼ਰੀਰਸ੍ਥਃ - though dwelling in the body
ਅਪਿ - even
ਕੌਂਤੇਯ - O son of Kunti (Arjuna)
ਨ ਕਰੋਤਿ - does not act
ਨ ਲਿਪ੍ਯਤੇ - is not affected

Translation (ਭਾਵਾਰ੍ਥ):
Because the supreme Self is without beginning and beyond material qualities, even though it resides in the body, O Arjuna, it neither acts nor is tainted by actions.

Commentary (ਅਨੁਸਂਧਾਨ):
This verse highlights the unique nature of the ਪਰਮਾਤ੍ਮਾ (supreme Self), using key terms like ਅਨਾਦਿਤ੍ਵਾਤ੍ (without beginning), ਨਿਰ੍ਗੁਣਤ੍ਵਾਤ੍ (without qualities), and ਅਵ੍ਯਯਃ (imperishable). The text explains that although the Self appears to reside in the body (ਸ਼ਰੀਰਸ੍ਥਃ), it remains untouched by bodily actions and experiences. The Self is not a doer (ਨ ਕਰੋਤਿ) nor does it become entangled in the results of actions (ਨ ਲਿਪ੍ਯਤੇ). This distinction is crucial for understanding the difference between the eternal Self and the temporary, ever-changing body and mind. The verse reassures that the true Self is not diminished or altered by the limitations or activities of the physical form.

ਆਦਿ ਸ਼ਂਕਰਾਚਾਰ੍ਯ elucidates that the Self's imperishability and freedom from action stem from its intrinsic nature as ਅਨਾਦਿਤ੍ਵ and ਨਿਰ੍ਗੁਣਤ੍ਵ, meaning it is beginningless and devoid of qualities, thus untouched by the body's deeds or impurities. ਸ਼੍ਰੀ ਰਾਮਾਨੁਜਾਚਾਰ੍ਯ complements this by explaining that the Self transcends the material modes of nature (ਪ੍ਰਕ੍ਰ੍ਤਿ), emphasizing that the individual soul is not the true agent of action but rather the body and mind are instruments. This understanding aligns with the Upanishadic teaching ਨ ਜਾਯਤੇ ਮ੍ਰਿਯਤੇ ਵਾ ਵਿਪਸ਼੍ਚਿਤ੍ from the ਕਠੋਪਨਿਸ਼ਦ੍ (1.2.18), which affirms the Self's eternal, unchanging reality beyond birth and death. Recognizing this distinction between the Self and the body-mind complex is essential, as it not only clarifies the Self's transcendence but also prepares the seeker to apply this knowledge practically, as discussed in the following paragraph.

In modern life, this teaching can be applied when facing blame or praise for actions performed in a professional or personal setting. For example, a manager may be held responsible for a team's failure, but understanding the distinction between the true Self and the role can help maintain inner peace. Similarly, when someone feels overwhelmed by emotions or stress, remembering that the core Self remains untouched can provide comfort. As a reflection exercise, try to observe your thoughts and actions for a day, reminding yourself that your deepest identity is not defined by these outer experiences. Notice how this perspective influences your reactions and sense of well-being.

ਯਥਾ ਸਰ੍ਵਗਤਂ ਸੌਕ੍ਸ਼੍ਮ੍ਯਾਤ੍ ਆਕਾਸ਼ਂ ਨੋਪਲਿਪ੍ਯਤੇ ।
ਸਰ੍ਵਤ੍ਰਾਵਸ੍ਥਿਤੋ ਦੇਹੇ ਤਥਾ਽਽ਤ੍ਮਾ ਨੋਪਲਿਪ੍ਯਤੇ ॥32॥

Meaning (ਪਦਾਰ੍ਥ):
ਯਥਾ - just as
ਸਰ੍ਵਗਤਂ - all-pervading (existing everywhere)
ਸੌਕ੍ਸ਼੍ਮ੍ਯਾਤ੍ - due to subtlety (because of being extremely subtle)
ਆਕਾਸ਼ਂ - space (ether)
ਨ ਉਪਲਿਪ੍ਯਤੇ - is not tainted (does not get attached)
ਸਰ੍ਵਤ੍ਰ - everywhere
ਅਵਸ੍ਥਿਤਹ੍ - situated (existing)
ਦੇਹੇ - in the body
ਤਥਾ - in the same way
ਆਤ੍ਮਾ - the Self
ਨ ਉਪਲਿਪ੍ਯਤੇ - is not tainted (does not get affected)

Translation (ਭਾਵਾਰ੍ਥ):
Just as space, being extremely subtle and present everywhere, is never tainted by anything it contains, so too the Self, though present in every body, remains untouched and unaffected.

Commentary (ਅਨੁਸਂਧਾਨ):
This verse uses the analogy of space (ਆਕਾਸ਼ਂ) to illustrate the nature of the Self (ਆਤ੍ਮਾ). Space is described as all-pervading (ਸਰ੍ਵਗਤਂ) and extremely subtle (ਸੌਕ੍ਸ਼੍ਮ੍ਯਾਤ੍), which means it is present everywhere and cannot be stained or altered by anything that happens within it. Similarly, the Self, though it exists in all bodies (ਦੇਹੇ), is never tainted (ਨ ਉਪਲਿਪ੍ਯਤੇ) by the actions, experiences, or qualities of the body and mind. The key point is that the Self is fundamentally different from the body and its attributes; it remains pure and unchanged regardless of the circumstances it is associated with. This teaching encourages us to recognize the distinction between our true nature and the temporary conditions we experience.

ਆਦਿ ਸ਼ਂਕਰਾਚਾਰ੍ਯ explains that the Self is untouched because it is ਨਿਰ੍ਗੁਨ-without qualities-and thus not an agent of action, much like space remains unaffected by what occurs within it. ਸ਼੍ਰੀ ਰਾਮਾਨੁਜਾਚਾਰ੍ਯ further clarifies that the Self is eternal and immutable, never subject to decay or change despite residing in the body, emphasizing its transcendence over material nature. This is supported by the ਕਠੋਪਨਿਸ਼ਦ੍ (1.2.18) declaration: ਨ ਜਾਯਤੇ ਮ੍ਰਿਯਤੇ ਵਾ ਵਿਪਸ਼੍ਚਿਤ੍, meaning the Self neither takes birth nor dies, nor is it subject to any transformation. This insight deepens the understanding introduced in the first paragraph, reinforcing that the Self's purity and detachment from bodily qualities form the foundation for spiritual knowledge. Recognizing this distinction prepares the seeker to apply this wisdom practically, as will be discussed next.

In modern life, this teaching can be applied when we face criticism, praise, or emotional turmoil. For example, if someone insults us, our true Self remains unaffected, just as space is not stained by smoke. Similarly, when we achieve success or suffer setbacks, our inner essence is unchanged. Another example is during meditation: even if distracting thoughts arise, the witnessing awareness is untouched. As a reflection exercise, consider a recent situation where you felt disturbed or elated. Ask yourself: Was my deepest awareness truly changed, or was it only the surface mind and emotions? This can help cultivate inner steadiness and resilience.

ਯਥਾ ਪ੍ਰਕਾਸ਼ਯਤ੍ਯੇਕਃ ਕ੍ਰੁਰੁਇਤ੍ਸ੍ਨਂ ਲੋਕਮਿਮਂ ਰਵਿਃ ।
ਕ੍ਸ਼ੇਤ੍ਰਂ ਕ੍ਸ਼ੇਤ੍ਰੀ ਤਥਾ ਕ੍ਰੁਰੁਇਤ੍ਸ੍ਨਂ ਪ੍ਰਕਾਸ਼ਯਤਿ ਭਾਰਤ ॥33॥

Meaning (ਪਦਾਰ੍ਥ):
ਯਥਾ - just as
ਪ੍ਰਕਾਸ਼ਯਤਿ - illuminates, makes known
ਏਕਃ - one (single)
ਕ੍ਰੁਰੁਇਤ੍ਸ੍ਨਂ - the entire, whole
ਲੋਕਮ੍ - world, universe
ਇਮਮ੍ - this
ਰਵਿਃ - the sun
ਕ੍ਸ਼ੇਤ੍ਰਂ - the field (body)
ਕ੍ਸ਼ੇਤ੍ਰੀ - the knower of the field (Self)
ਤਥਾ - in the same way
ਕ੍ਰੁਰੁਇਤ੍ਸ੍ਨਂ - the entire, whole
ਪ੍ਰਕਾਸ਼ਯਤਿ - illuminates, reveals
ਭਾਰਤ - O descendant of Bharata (Arjuna)

Translation (ਭਾਵਾਰ੍ਥ):
Just as the single sun lights up the entire world, so too, O Arjuna, the knower of the body illuminates the whole field of the body.

Commentary (ਅਨੁਸਂਧਾਨ):
This verse uses the imagery of the sun (ਰਵਿਃ) and its illuminating power (ਪ੍ਰਕਾਸ਼ਯਤਿ) to explain the relationship between the Self (ਕ੍ਸ਼ੇਤ੍ਰੀ) and the body (ਕ੍ਸ਼ੇਤ੍ਰਂ). The sun, though one, lights up the whole world (ਕ੍ਰੁਰੁਇਤ੍ਸ੍ਨਂ ਲੋਕਮ੍), and in the same way, the Self, though singular and subtle, reveals and enlivens the entire body. The analogy emphasizes that the Self is not limited by the boundaries of the body, just as sunlight is not confined to any particular object it shines upon. The Self is the witness and illuminator of all bodily experiences, but remains unaffected by them, much like the sun remains unchanged regardless of what it shines upon.

ਆਦਿ ਸ਼ਂਕਰਾਚਾਰ੍ਯ elucidates that the Self, like the sun illuminating the entire world without being affected by it, is a pure, non-participating witness present throughout the body yet untouched by its actions or experiences. Similarly, ਸ਼੍ਰੀ ਰਾਮਾਨੁਜਾਚਾਰ੍ਯ emphasizes the subtlety and all-pervasiveness of the Self, comparing it to the ether (ਅਕਸ) which, though present everywhere, remains unstained by the objects it pervades. This aligns with the verse's analogy, reinforcing the Self's transcendence and purity. To deepen this understanding, the ਕਠੋਪਨਿਸ਼ਦ੍ (1.2.18) states: ਨ ਜਾਯਤੇ ਮ੍ਰਿਯਤੇ ਵਾ ਵਿਪਸ਼੍ਚਿਤ੍, meaning the Self neither takes birth nor dies, nor is it subject to decay. This Upanishadic insight supports the Gita's teaching that the Self is eternal and unaffected by the body's changes. Recognizing the Self's immutable nature as the ever-present illuminator prepares us to apply this wisdom practically, as discussed in the following paragraph.

In daily life, this teaching can help us remember that our true nature is not affected by the ups and downs of physical or emotional experiences-just as the sun is not changed by the things it illuminates. For example, when facing criticism at work, one can reflect that the inner Self remains untouched by external opinions. Similarly, during illness, recognizing that the body is merely the field and not the real Self can bring calm. As a reflection exercise, try to observe your thoughts and feelings for a few minutes each day, asking yourself: Who is aware of these experiences? This can help cultivate the perspective of the witness Self described in this verse.

ਕ੍ਸ਼ੇਤ੍ਰਕ੍ਸ਼ੇਤ੍ਰਜ੍ਞਯੋਰੇਵਮ੍ ਅਂਤਰਂ ਜ੍ਞਾਨਚਕ੍ਸ਼ੁਸ਼ਾ ।
ਭੂਤਪ੍ਰਕ੍ਰੁਰੁਇਤਿਮੋਕ੍ਸ਼ਂ ਚ ਯੇ ਵਿਦੁਰ੍ਯਾਂਤਿ ਤੇ ਪਰਮ੍ ॥34॥

Meaning (ਪਦਾਰ੍ਥ):
ਕ੍ਸ਼ੇਤ੍ਰ - the field (body or matter)
ਕ੍ਸ਼ੇਤ੍ਰਜ੍ਞ - knower of the field (conscious self)
ਯੋਹੋ - of the two (genitive dual, 'of kShetra and kShetraj~na')
ਏਵਂ - thus, in this way
ਅਂਤਰਂ - distinction, difference
ਜ੍ਞਾਨ-ਚਕ੍ਸ਼ੁਸ਼ਾ - with the eye of knowledge (by spiritual insight)
ਭੂਤ-ਪ੍ਰਕ੍ਰੁਰੁਇਤਿ-ਮੋਕ੍ਸ਼ਂ - the liberation from the nature of beings (release from material nature)
ਚ - and
ਯੇ - those who
ਵਿਦੁਃ - know, understand
ਯਾਂਤਿ - attain, reach
ਤੇ - they
ਪਰਮ੍ - the supreme (goal, reality)

Translation (ਭਾਵਾਰ੍ਥ):
Those who, through the eye of wisdom, recognize the true distinction between the field and the knower of the field, and also understand how beings are bound and liberated from material nature, they alone reach the highest reality.

Commentary (ਅਨੁਸਂਧਾਨ):
This verse brings together several key concepts from the chapter, especially the terms ਕ੍ਸ਼ੇਤ੍ਰ (the field), ਕ੍ਸ਼ੇਤ੍ਰਜ੍ਞ (the knower of the field), ਅਂਤਰਂ (distinction), and ਜ੍ਞਾਨ-ਚਕ੍ਸ਼ੁਸ਼ਾ (the eye of knowledge). The field refers to the body and all material phenomena, while the knower is the conscious self that perceives and experiences. The distinction between these two is not obvious to ordinary perception; it requires inner vision or wisdom. The verse also mentions ਭੂਤ-ਪ੍ਰਕ੍ਰੁਰੁਇਤਿ-ਮੋਕ੍ਸ਼ਂ, pointing to the process by which beings are entangled in, and can be freed from, the influence of material nature. Only those who truly understand these distinctions and processes, not just intellectually but through deep realization, can attain the ultimate goal.

The illumination of the ਕ੍ਸ਼ੇਤ੍ਰ by the ਕ੍ਸ਼ੇਤ੍ਰਜ੍ਞ is a profound metaphor that ਆਦਿ ਸ਼ਂਕਰਾਚਾਰ੍ਯ explains as the self's singular, unchanging light that pervades all bodies yet remains untouched by them, much like the sun that shines on all without being sullied. He underscores the self's transcendence beyond the physical and mental layers, emphasizing its immutable nature. Meanwhile, ਸ਼੍ਰੀ ਮਧ੍ਵਾਚਾਰ੍ਯ interprets this verse as a directive to discriminate between the transient material field and the eternal knower, highlighting the practical necessity of this knowledge for liberation. This discernment aligns with the Upanishadic injunction ਨ ਜਾਯਤੇ ਮ੍ਰਿਯਤੇ ਵਾ ਵਿਪਸ਼੍ਚਿਤ੍ from the ਕਠੋਪਨਿਸ਼ਦ੍ (1.2.18), which declares that the true self neither takes birth nor dies, nor is it subject to decay. Together, these teachings deepen the understanding introduced in the first paragraph about the distinction between the field and its knower, preparing the seeker to apply this insight practically, as discussed next.

In modern life, this teaching can be applied by recognizing that our true identity is not limited to our physical body or our thoughts. For example, when facing criticism at work, remembering the distinction between the 'field' (the situation, the emotions) and the 'knower' (the inner observer) can help maintain equanimity. Similarly, when caught up in material pursuits, understanding how attachment binds us can inspire us to seek inner freedom. As a reflection exercise, try to observe your thoughts and feelings for a few minutes each day, asking yourself: Who is aware of these experiences? This practice can gradually reveal the difference between the experiencer and the experiences, leading to greater clarity and peace.

॥ ਓਂ ਤਤ੍ਸਦਿਤਿ ਸ਼੍ਰੀਮਦ੍ਭਗਵਦ੍ਗੀਤਾਸੁ ਉਪਨਿਸ਼ਤ੍ਸੁ ਬ੍ਰਹ੍ਮਵਿਦ੍ਯਾਯਾਂ
ਯੋਗਸ਼ਾਸ੍ਤ੍ਰੇ ਸ਼੍ਰੀਕ੍ਰੁਰੁਇਸ਼੍ਣਾਰ੍ਜੁਨਸਂਵਾਦੇ ਕ੍ਸ਼ੇਤ੍ਰਕ੍ਸ਼ੇਤ੍ਰਜ੍ਞਵਿਭਾਗਯੋਗੋ ਨਾਮ ਤ੍ਰਯੋਦਸ਼ੋ਽ਧ੍ਯਾਯਃ ॥

Meaning (ਪਦਾਰ੍ਥ):
ਓਂ - primordial syllable, sacred invocation
ਤਤ੍ਸਤ੍ - that which is true, ultimate reality
ਇਤਿ - thus, in this way
ਸ਼੍ਰੀਮਦ੍ਭਗਵਦ੍ਗੀਤਾਸੁ - in the revered Bhagavad Gita
ਉਪਨਿਸ਼ਤ੍ਸੁ - among the Upanishads (as spiritual dialogues)
ਬ੍ਰਹ੍ਮਵਿਦ੍ਯਾਯਾਂ - in the knowledge of Brahman, spiritual wisdom
ਯੋਗਸ਼ਾਸ੍ਤ੍ਰੇ - in the scripture of ਯੋਗ, discipline of union
ਸ਼੍ਰੀਕ੍ਰੁਰੁਇਸ਼੍ਣਾਰ੍ਜੁਨ ਸਂਵਾਦੇ - in the dialogue between Sri Krishna and Arjuna
ਕ੍ਸ਼ੇਤ੍ਰਕ੍ਸ਼ੇਤ੍ਰਜ੍ਞਵਿਭਾਗਯੋਗਃ - the ਯੋਗ of distinction between the field and the knower of the field
ਨਾਮ - named, called
ਤ੍ਰਯੋਦਸ਼ਃ ਅਧ੍ਯਾਯਃ - thirteenth chapter

Translation (ਭਾਵਾਰ੍ਥ):
Thus ends the thirteenth chapter, called The Yoga of the Distinction between the Field and the Knower of the Field, in the revered Bhagavad Gita, which is a dialogue between Sri Krishna and Arjuna, and is a scripture of yoga and knowledge of the ultimate reality, among the Upanishads.

Commentary (ਅਨੁਸਂਧਾਨ):
This concluding colophon summarizes the chapter and its context. The key terms here are ਕ੍ਸ਼ੇਤ੍ਰ (field), ਕ੍ਸ਼ੇਤ੍ਰਜ੍ਞ (knower of the field), ਯੋਗਸ਼ਾਸ੍ਤ੍ਰ (scripture of ਯੋਗ), and ਬ੍ਰਹ੍ਮਵਿਦ੍ਯਾ (knowledge of Brahman). The chapter is identified as a dialogue between Krishna and Arjuna, emphasizing its didactic nature. The phrase ਕ੍ਸ਼ੇਤ੍ਰਕ੍ਸ਼ੇਤ੍ਰਜ੍ਞਵਿਭਾਗਯੋਗ highlights the main theme: distinguishing between the physical body and the conscious self. The mention of ਉਪਨਿਸ਼ਤ੍ਸੁ places the Gita within the tradition of spiritual inquiry found in the Upanishads, suggesting its teachings are not just practical but also deeply philosophical and metaphysical.

ਆਦਿ ਸ਼ਂਕਰਾਚਾਰ੍ਯ interprets the distinction between ਕ੍ਸ਼ੇਤ੍ਰ (the field) and ਕ੍ਸ਼ੇਤ੍ਰਜ੍ਞ (the knower of the field) through the lens of Advaita Vedanta, emphasizing the essential non-duality of the self beyond the transient body. He relates this to the Upanishadic invocation ਮ੍ਰੁਰੁਇਤ੍ਯੋਰ੍ਮਾ ਅਮ੍ਰੁਰੁਇਤਂ ਗਮਯ from the Bhadrayaka Upanishad, which means 'Lead me from death to immortality,' highlighting the journey from identification with the perishable body to realization of the imperishable consciousness. In contrast, ਸ਼੍ਰੀ ਰਾਮਾਨੁਜਾਚਾਰ੍ਯ presents a qualified non-dualism where the soul and body are distinct yet inseparably related, with both ultimately dependent on the Supreme Lord. This understanding deepens the chapter's teaching by showing how discriminative knowledge of the field and its knower is foundational not only for metaphysical insight but also for practical spiritual progress. Such clarity prepares the seeker to apply these truths in daily life, as discussed in the following paragraph.

In modern life, the distinction between the body and the conscious self can help us manage stress and anxiety, reminding us that our true identity is not limited to physical experiences. For example, someone facing a health challenge can reflect on being more than just their body, finding strength in their inner awareness. In another case, a person overwhelmed by work pressures might use this teaching to step back and observe their thoughts, recognizing the witness within. As a reflection exercise, take a few minutes to sit quietly and notice the difference between your physical sensations and the awareness that observes them. This practice can foster clarity and resilience in everyday challenges.




Browse Related Categories: